Would National Socialism and Antisemitism disappear if Hitler had stepped down after loosing the air over Britain and the ground in Russia? I don't think so. I have argued for a long time that the absence of Hitler, a bumbling boob of a militarist, would have meant a win for the Third Reich. By my way of thinking, Rommel or Donitz could have taken Europe and threatened our East Coast, possibly enhancing Japans chances for success in the Pacific. No, young feller, Hitler is a good chess piece in history, a Pawn who though he was a Knight then became King of the losing side. Leave him where he is, sick, demented, alone.
2007-06-05 13:28:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by TD Euwaite? 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
If Hitler was a friend of the Jews, he would have never attained the power that he did in the first place. Also, the Allies did not enter Germany because they persecuted Jews. In fact, the Allies didn't even know of any persecution of the Jews. The reason why the Allies went to war was because Germany was becoming very large and powerful. So, no, if there was no antisemitism there'd be no Hitler. And if there was no Hitler Germany would haven't ever had the glory that it did. And even with all that aside, if Germany was still able to take over Europe, The allies would have still gone to war, and Germany still would have been defeated.
2016-04-01 04:21:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler offered Peace with Britain after the fall of France. Britain turned them down. Germany had actually demobilized some reserve Divisions
2007-06-05 13:44:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
As long as he did it before June 22, maybe, though more likely it'd've ended up much like it did after WWI - isolated and facing substantial restrictions as terms of surrender. If you're talking after he attacked the Soviets, forget it, they'd have taken the war to Germany, no question.
2007-06-05 12:36:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It almost happened. When Schickelgruber (AKA Hitler) conducted his first incursion into another country (it was either Belgium or Prussia) he gave very specific orders stating that if they met with ANY resistance from the opposing forces they were to withdraw immediately.
Even in 1941, Hitler was unsure of his forces and the intentions of other nations.
2007-06-05 13:07:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Germany is anyway despite being pounded into the dirt.
Hitler never listened to his generals, his advisors or any one with any common sense. He just plowed ahead. In 1943 despite Heinz Guderian practically begging him to maintain a defensive stance in the East...he went with his Kursk SURGE and of course the rest is history.
2007-06-05 12:36:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
No. They're situation was different. They whould be kicked to death by the US Army Air Service and RAF with raids. then the troops on the ground would invade Germany. If you compare this to the Iraqi war, well, if we pulled out, the Iraqis could solve their own problems.
2007-06-05 12:44:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by awesomenacho 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hitler never listened to the greatest German chancellor Otto von Birmarck, who urged Germans to never attack Russia.
Now a piece of his skull, boxed and packed, lays in Moscow archive.
2007-06-05 13:05:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
no he wouldnt because germany would still not be alowed to bear arms because of the devistation they caused in ww2
2007-06-05 14:21:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Honey Badger Doesnt give a Shat 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
And the validity of your question is leading to????
2007-06-05 12:33:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by lifetimefamily 4
·
1⤊
0⤋