can u do some criticism of buddhism?

Question

i am writting a paper on buddhism and existence of suffering,, could u give me some suggestion,,,
by writting some criticism of buddhism.... why all people cant practice buddhism? and how is buddhism unable to follow the path of peace and some examples that contrast with buddhism non-violence philosophy..
and some comparision (pros and cons) of buddhism with christianity and hinduism.


sorry for the trouble
thankx :)

Answer 1

No trouble at all. What I am about to say I would hardly consider "criticism", however the fact is Buddhism, conceptually is very difficult to understand. It is really more of a practice which is the main reason why not all people can practice it. It requires one to go almost completely against the grain in terms of how we think and are taught to think. And let's face it, from the time that we come into this world we are groomed to think a certain way, hold true to our perception of things and totally ignore the fact that our perceptions are not reality. Our perceptions are just our individual views and thereby sculpt our behavior which makes being asked to let go of our perceptions, simply see things as they are and simply act in the moment without given it too much thought very very difficult for most people, even people who have been practicing for years. For some it seems impossible.

Now regarding your next question about buddhism being unable to follow the path of peace. I wouldn't say that practice is unable or contradictory as much as I would that the practice requires that once a decision has been made to act in whatever way one has chosen, one must be prepared recieve the Karma for those actions. Buddhism is the practice of peace, inner and outer peace, however people have the ablity to choose there own path within the practice.

I was raised in a Baptist church and didn't discover buddhism until my mid twenties. I've never practiced Hinduism though Buddhism does get some of it origin from it. The only comparison I can offer is this. Where as most religions Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, etc...etc... have a belief system or doctrine that one must accept and follow in order to be considered thus, Buddshism can come across as being rather agnostic considering you don't have to believe anything you don't want to believe to be a Buddhist. You may believe in God, or be an Atheist. You may abstain from sex or not. You may be vegetarian or eat meat. Buddhism, I'll say, unlike other religions encourages you to come as you are, accept yourself, flaws and all as your are, accept all people and your surroundings as they are, your life as you know it right now as it is and go from there. You don't have to become someone else or forcefully change your life be happy. The change comes when you stop trying to change.

Answer 2

There are a few criticism on the basis of divisions of Buddhism is for love for all mankind and living beings, there is a major section of Buddhists who are meat eaters. (A small percentage who are against this view are vegetarilans) 2. Sanyasins culture does not bar from accepting rituals in favour of sanyasins. Ceremonies are performed in the buddhist homes with serveral offerings to the Bikshus. 3. Cases exist when sanysin's have wield weapons for killing for political causes. Otherwise, the preachings of Buddhism are good for all mankind, though it says there is no creator. But buddha himself is revered as God by the followers, which goes against Buddhism. The main theme of Love and Universal brotherhood is really a thing to be appreciated of Buddhism. VR

Answer 3

Well, from a Buddhist perspective...

All people can't practice Buddhism because it was based on one man's journey to enlightenment. Siddhartha Gautama's methods may not suit everyone, some people prefer to follow Taoism, Sufi Islam, Kabballah, Gnosticism, or other mystic paths.

The only example of Buddhism being used in a violent way is the group known as the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, but most of us mainstream Buddhists don't condone their violent ways.

The last question is completely relative...

Answer 4

It's not "trouble", it's simply unethical if I answer your question for you. What you ask takes research and analytical study and even if I were to supply you with your answers, it would take far more space than I have here to answer.

www.buddhanet.net, also, His Holiness the Dalai Lama speaks much on why some people aren't suited for Buddhist philosophy. Many teachers also break down, in simple language why peace vs. the ego is an issue. The comparisons will also have to come from YOUR mind.

www.thubtenchodron.org is a great site to read about and understand how ego causes suffering, etc.

May you find what you seek. There are many sites beyond what I've listed for you. I wish you an excellent grade on your homework.

_()_

Answer 5

Criticism? well, for instance, in order to reach 'enlightment' you need to get rid of your ego, and they don't mean "be generous", they mean "lose your identity". Being 'you' is an obstacle when reaching truth, and in my case, i would never ever be able to simply ditch my history, personality and whatever makes me have an identity. Also, i would need to follow a path of loneliness, sacrifice, and prayer and ultimately let go of whatever attaches you to this life. So i wouldn't do it. I desperately need to know that i exist and how i am, and i know many, many people feel the same way.

In the other hand, buddhism can't be compared to hinduism and christianity because buddhism is not a religion, it is a philosophy and therefore lacks a god.

Answer 6

Somebody waited until the last minute to write a paper didn't they?