This "ultimate authority" must be unknowable. Surely it's supernatural and by definition beyond human knowledge.
2007-06-05 06:10:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lone-wolf 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Can there really be an ultimate authority of everything? Or are we just chasing a mirage? There seem to be three possibilities:
• There really is a complete unified theory, which we will someday discover if we are smart enough.
• There is no ultimate theory of the universe, just an infinite sequence of theories that describe the universe more and more accurately.
• There is no theory of the universe. Events cannot be predicted beyond a certain extent but occur in a random and arbitrary manner.
Some would argue for the third possibility on the grounds that if there were complete set of laws, that would infringe on God’s freedom to change His mind and to intervene in the world. It’s a bit like the old paradox: Can God make a stone so heavy that He can’t lift it? But the idea that God might want to change His example of the fallacy, pointed out by St. Augustine, of imagining God as a being existing in time. Time is a property only of the universe that God created. Presumably, He knew what He intended when He set it up. With the advent of quantum mechanics, we have come to realize that events cannot be predicted with complete accuracy but that there is always a degree of uncertainty. If one liked, one could ascribe this randomness to the intervention of God. But it would be a very strange kind of intervention. There is no evidence that it is directed toward any purpose. Indeed, if it were, it wouldn’t be random. In modern times, we have effectively removed the third possibility by redefining the goal of science. Our aim is to formulate a set of laws that will enable us to predict events up to the limit set by the uncertainty principle.
The second possibility, that there is an infinite sequence of more and more refined theories, is in agreement with all our experience so far. On many occasions, we have increased the sensitivity of our measurements or made a new class of observations only to discover new phenomena that were not predicted by the existing theory. To account for these, we have had to develop a more advanced theory. It would therefore not be very surprising if we find that our present grand unified theories break down when we test them on bigger and more powerful particle accelerators. Indeed, if we didn’t expect them to break down, there wouldn’t be much point in spending all that money on building more powerful machines.
However, it seems that gravity may provide a limit to this sequence of “boxes within boxes.” If one had a particle with an energy above what is called the Planck energy, 1019 GeV, its mass would be so concentrated that it would cut itself off from the rest of the universe and form a little black hole. Thus, it does seem that the sequence of more and more refined theories should have some limit as we go to higher and higher energies. There should be some ultimate theory of the universe. Of course, the Planck energy is a very long way from the energies of around a GeV, which are the most that we can produce in the laboratory at the present time. To bridge that gap would require a particle accelerator that was bigger than the solar system. Such an accelerator would be unlikely to be funded in the present economic climate.
However, the very early stages of the universe are an arena where such energies must have occurred. I think that there is a good chance that the study of the early universe and the requirements of mathematical consistency will lead us to a complete unified theory by the end of the century—always presuming we don’t blow ourselves up first. What would it mean if we actually did discover the ultimate theory of the universe? It would bring to an end a long and glorious chapter in the history of our struggle to understand the universe. But it would also revolutionize the ordinary person’s understanding of the laws that govern the universe. In Newton’s time it was possible for an educated person to have a grasp of the whole of human knowledge, at least in outline. But ever since then, the pace of development of science has made this impossible. Theories were always being changed to account for new observations. They were never properly digested or simplified so that ordinary people could understand them. You had to be a specialist, and even then you could only hope to have a proper grasp of a small proportional of the scientific theories.
2007-06-05 13:11:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
I think I'm smart, but I'm certainly not the ultimate authority on anything, let alone everything.
2007-06-05 13:18:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't, and I am not. I don't think I ever will know everything or be the ultimate authority.
It's a worthy goal, though. If I had a thousand years to live, I MIGHT get halfway there.
2007-06-05 13:14:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No human being knows everything there is to know. Without such knowledge there can be no human who is an ultimate authority.
2007-06-05 13:16:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sebastian 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Me, the ultimate authority. LOL!
2007-06-05 13:15:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I AM the ultimate authority for Spirituality
because:
I have Created My Relationship with Our Creator
and
I can direct You so You Create Your Relationship;
Here's the simple way to Create Your Relationship:
Create a Private, Personal, Direct, Divine Relationship with Our Creator and save Your Soul from religion's and atheist's beliefs and start Your journey back home, to Heaven.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Love is the answer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Love and Believe in Our Creator;
Love and Believe in Yourself.
Only with Our Creator's Love and Peace will we be Truly Free!
Without God, there is No Love; Without religion, there are No Wars!
"religion is Spiritual fraud";
"religion is the Worse invention of humanity";
"Universal Truth has eliminated religion from Spirituality",
quotes of Jesus Christ, Buddha and any one else with Spiritual intelligence.
"When a person is freed of religion, they have a better chance to live a normal and wholesome life." S. Freud
Freedom of religion is Freedom from religion.
2007-06-05 13:13:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You called, madam?
Sorry for the delay - I've been sorting out the Middle East.
CD
2007-06-05 13:15:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO One
2007-06-05 13:11:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by punch 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only the Illuminati can answer that one
2007-06-05 13:10:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋