English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...was really a missile and not the plane at all. I considered this to be quite a possibility until I did a little reasearch. They are able to track planes in flight at all times, like a lojack or a GPS in your car. If the plane went someplace other than the Pentagon, shouldn't they have been able to track it and say where it went? Also, what kind of missile was it that hit the pentagon? The people from the military I spoke with said that we do not have any missiles that do that kind of damage. I do not know too much about missiles, so I was hoping someone with more knowledge could educate me.

1) Where did the plane go, and why wasn't its location traced?
2) What kind of missile hit the Pentagon?

2007-06-05 05:36:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

good god! don't encourage them!

2007-06-05 05:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

The explosive power and the manner in which the Pentagon was damaged was caused by jet fuel and lots of it. It is not possible, not even in ones wildest imagination, for a missile to carry enough fuel to do the damage that was done at the Pentagon. Also, all other explosives with the equivalent power of the Pentagon 9/11 incident would have left a much different damage footprint that would be easily recognizable.
The damage done to the Pentagon was most definitely the result off a very large aircraft flying into it.

2007-06-12 16:16:47 · answer #2 · answered by Terry J 1 · 0 1

The 9/11 nuts are at it again. The tin foil hats that deflect the alien rays that make them stupid must have wore out.

Truth is that some hijackers of Arab descent hijacked some planes and flew them into buildings. A conspiracy that says the WTC was wired is stupid, because you can't keep that a secret.

2007-06-05 05:42:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

As with most conspiracy theories, the alternative explanations are about 1000 times more complicated to set up, cover up, and execute than what the obvious explanation is.

2007-06-05 05:45:26 · answer #4 · answered by nileslad 6 · 1 4

I'm so tired of this dam conspiracy theorists why don't thay do something productive like not talking for a start...

2007-06-05 06:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

if you want someone with KNOWLEDGE a conspiracy theorist is definately the wrong choice.

2007-06-05 06:01:10 · answer #6 · answered by Joe #26 2 · 4 4

IT WAS INSIDE JOB!

2007-06-12 03:27:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

http://physics911.net/missingwings


Thank you for asking questions about this event.

2007-06-05 05:55:47 · answer #8 · answered by Elizabeth H 1 · 2 5

Thanks, Elizabeth H for providing the information. As for the others here.....

2007-06-05 06:22:17 · answer #9 · answered by WMD 7 · 0 6

AHAH HA HA HA HA HA HAHAHAAAAAA !

2007-06-05 06:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

fedest.com, questions and answers