English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-05 03:17:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

Yes i'm this and that...

Bohm states that our brains are smaller pieces of the larger hologram. That our brains contain the whole knowledge of the universe. So, you can see how each mind has a limited perspective of the universal hologram. Our brains are our windows of perception. Each mind always contains the whole picture, but with a limited and unclear perspective. We each have different experience in our lives, but each perspective is valid. Our brains mathematically construct objective reality by interpreting frequencies that are ultimately projections form another dimension, a deeper order of existence that is beyond both space and time.

GH - Time, along with particles, is a human representation, both being caused by the wave Motion of Space (thus the name of this website SpaceandMotion). So the Wave Structure of Matter is founded on the Metaphysics of Space and (wave) Motion rather than Space and Time. But Space itself does physically exist (as a Wave-Medium).

The brain is a hologram enfolded in a holographic universe. We can view ourselves as physical bodies moving through space. Or we can view ourselves as a blur of interference patterns enfolded throughout the cosmic hologram.
This could be also expressed with the analogy that the brain is like the laser beam that shines through the holographic film to interpret the patterns. As it turns out, you can preserve the interference patterns of more than one hologram on the same film by using various different angles of projection of the laser beams.
Therefore, depending on the direction and frequency of the beam that you send through the film, a different hologram will appear. So, if applied to the brain, consciousness literally becomes the co-creator of the reality portrayed depending upon its angle of perception. This does not mean that if I am looking at a tree, it is not really there. The tree is there on multidimensional levels, which means that I am seeing a cross-section of the tree depending on the level of consciousness that I am tuned into. If the brain is a decoder of sorts, then it can be tuned to different states or frequencies of consciousness, and I will see different levels of tree reality depending upon which one I'm on.
Therefore, mind contributes to the phenomenon of reality itself, not just to the knowledge of it. In a brain that operates holographically, the remembered image of a thing can have as much impact on the senses as the thing itself.

Bohm uses his idea of the implicate order, the deeper and non-local level of existence from which our entire universe springs, to echo this sentiment: (...)

2007-06-05 21:31:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I Am Becoming so I will not claim to be That. Being That kind of sounds complete. I'll let you know if I ever become That.
Love & Light
Sharon
One Planet = One People

2007-06-05 03:23:15 · answer #2 · answered by Soul 5 · 0 0

What else could I be...nothing.

~ Eric Putkonen

2007-06-05 03:27:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am all THAT i say I am, and nothing more. So I guess I am THAT, because I just said that. but that sometimes means this, or that, or that other meaning.

2007-06-05 03:20:36 · answer #4 · answered by SWT 6 · 1 0

y

2007-06-05 03:19:22 · answer #5 · answered by Irosh Bandara 5 · 0 0

Yea I am

2007-06-05 03:19:28 · answer #6 · answered by JerseyRick 6 · 0 0

i was but i got over it

2007-06-05 03:23:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am ALL that, and a bag of chips.

2007-06-05 03:19:21 · answer #8 · answered by count scratchula 4 · 2 0

Yes i am that.

2007-06-05 03:18:57 · answer #9 · answered by LOTR Fan 5 · 0 0

no I am me only me

2007-06-05 04:27:18 · answer #10 · answered by Mark freestyle 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers