If so, who was the most ridiculous....and who was the least ridiculous?
2007-06-05 03:05:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
What ever happened to separation of Church and State? If i was voting for a leader, I'd want one with their feet firmly rooted in reality, not a believer in magical, non-existent creatures, or some schizophrenic who listens to the voices in his head and thinks that it's some deity.
2007-06-05 03:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by Nodality 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I saw it. I wouldn't say anyone sounded ridiculous... maybe John Edwards who comes onto a program about faith and says he doesn't believe in creationism.
Obama did really good. He has shown me time and time again that he is a good guy (or as close to a good guy as a politician can be) but I don't know if he can execute the ideas he has.
I was somewhat disappointed when Senator Clinton was asked how her faith got her through her husbands infidelity. If she was a man the question would not have been asked. She did give a good answer though. She found a way to show some emotion which is something we don't see from her too often. She had a great response to the abortion question, probably the best of the evening.
My ideal winner for 2008 would be Hilary Clinton as President and Barak Obama as Vice President.
2007-06-05 09:58:45 · answer #2 · answered by World Peace Girl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I missed that. I could probably guess at the most ridiculous without having seen the interview....
Just from watching the democrats' debate, I'm still trying to figure out if Hilary has a stance on anything or just skirts the issue every time she's asked a question.
Here come the thumbs down...
2007-06-05 03:10:12 · answer #3 · answered by KS 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't think their faith is any of our business, unless it necessitates them starting a nuclear war or sacrificing 7 virgins at each full moon. It's like when John Kerry had to announce that he believed that "marriage is between a man and a woman." Who cares? It's about as relevant as "I believe a guinea pig is a fine pet."
To sum up: I think it was *all* ridiculous. It's just a way of pandering to the Christianists.
2007-06-05 03:15:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was embarrassing, wasn't it? I'd have to call it a tie. But, we know that votes don't put a person in the office of president. We all know that they are appointed. So, they are all ridiculous. Why not take the campaign money and feed our hungry and house our homeless?
2007-06-05 03:13:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why didnt they pass lower back to him in the event that they actually had to take heed to what he had to assert answer they didnt hear to communicate radio how Paul supporters get cut back off and the host tries to make it appear as if its in the flow of the coach or A Paul supporter says one element and the host thoroughly misconstrues it
2016-10-06 22:00:03 · answer #6 · answered by carol 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I only heard clips on NPR this morning. The extreme fakeness of using faith as a political tool turns me off.
2007-06-05 03:11:25 · answer #7 · answered by G's Random Thoughts 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I didn't hear it, but I heard some sound clips this a.m. on the radio. I gotta say the one I heard from Hillary was ridiculous. I mean how many times can she fit "faith" into one response? Ugh, made me ill, and I usually vote on the dem ticket!
2007-06-05 03:08:55 · answer #8 · answered by glitterkittyy 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I saw that, I do not care what politicians think about religion. I am sick of the subject. The entire discussion was the most ridiculous.
2007-06-05 03:09:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton, the most ridiculous.
2007-06-05 03:08:44 · answer #10 · answered by X Theist 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋