~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
The policy is called, "Take the lucrative U.S. taxpayer dollar and give it to the greedy, selfish, flunking-this-life corporate executive management / wealthy shareholders by importing more, more, more cheap labor for the corporations; get benefits from taxpayers instead of paying decent wages and benefits to the illegal / legal immigrants; keep stealing from Social Security every second and 'fix' the problem by importing more, more, more cheap labor instead of solving the problems with the right solutions; thereby destroying our wildlife, our forests, our wide open spaces, our groundwater and everything else that makes our country beautiful, as well as our very future as a country policy."
A national id card to work or do ANYTHING in OUR COUNTRY FIRST, before finishing the border fence is what is necessary. Give illegal aliens a way out...give them notice: 'Just because a tiny percentage of U.S. citizens, namely, some illegal employers made you think it was okay to push your way into our country, it is NOT okay. Go home and take your anchor babies with you. We, the citizens of the United States are not going to pay you for illegally entering our country. It doesn't matter one iota what pushy English people hundreds of years ago did. WE ARE NOT THEM. They were more like pushy illegal aliens today...pushy.
Illegal employers should then be put in jail every day, not once in a great, great while for show. With nowhere to work, nowhere to gain social benefits (money from U.S. taxpayers), illegal aliens will leave through the border that is not fenced in yet.
For those who choose not to leave, and choose to riot, BRING HOME OUR NATIONAL GUARD TO DO THEIR JOB: PROTECT THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
This country does not belong to a tiny percentage of greedy, selfish, illegal employers and wealthy shareholders. This is OUR COUNTRY, oh so-called 'leaders' in the Senate, House and Administration.
~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
2007-06-05 03:02:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by CQ 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's called "amnesty".
It was tried back in 1986, and it didn't work. All it did was encourage more illegals to sneak across our open southern border.
Just giving out blanket amnesty to illegals here is an easy-way cop-out. What needs to be done *first* is to secure our southern border as best we can - and don't let anyone B.S. you - it *can* be done, if we have the guts and will to do it. Then what we need to do is find out exactly who is here illegally and how many (right now nobody has any idea, believe it or not). Then we offer them a chance at potential citizenship *if* they apply for it the conventional way, and take the necessary exams that all naturalized citizens have to take. Proficiency in English should be made mandatory. (Mexico does not allow anyone to become a citizen of *their* country unless they pass a tough exam showing they are proficient in Spanish - why shouldn't we do likewise with English here??) All proper criminal background checks should be made, and proof of immunizations and health checks should be made. None of this is being proposed now.
The cowardly and craven politicians who are pandering to big money interests and Latino activists are trying to ram amnesty down our throats no matter what. Call or write your Senator or congressperson and let them know what you think about all of this.
Most Americans still aren't paying attention to this issue - your question shows that. This is something that has been building up and has been planned for many years. If people don't wake up, it's going to be a done deal, and it will be too late to stop it.
Nemisis: You are 100% right. You said in a few choice words what it took me three times as many to say LOL
KP & CQ: Right on the money........
2007-06-05 01:52:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by the phantom 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bill S-1348 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 The legislation would provide a path to citizenship for many of the 12 million illegal workers inside the country.
Follow the links to answer your question.
http://www.congressandimmigration.com/S-1348immigration2007.htm
2007-06-05 01:48:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Naturescent 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not yet, but if someone doesn't stand against it & the right politicans care & listen it will happen. Illegal residents are so much more vocal about their view point: parades, demostrations, etc, the rest of us are helpless, we try to take a stand and get called racist.
2007-06-05 02:54:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by KP 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think it's been passed yet.
It boils down to idiocy, laziness, and greed. They're idiots, because someone hear illegally is supposed to be deported. It's lazy, because they don't wanna bother putting effort into tracking down and dealing with said illegals. It's greed, because those illegals-turned-citizens will of course support them because they like that political group, so that group has a good chance of pulling off BS that nets them more money outta the pockets of honest American citizens who earned what they got and weren't just handed it.
Grab your sled, because we're on a downward slope.
2007-06-05 01:39:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nemesis 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
i think of that each and each era will stay at a extra effectual value of residing because of the fact the previous. via the time they attain to the third era, those new toddlers could have a extra effectual possibility of winding up severe college and faculty, and qualifying for extra effectual paying jobs. i think of that people who have self belief that when the illegals are "legalized" that their toddlers, and their youngster's toddlers could proceed working substandard jobs for little pay. it incredibly is because of the fact they now could have a voice to talk up and insist to be paid minimum salary basically like people who're right here legally. i think of that there are some subject concerns that alot of persons fail to take a normal look at whilst speaking proper to the unlawful immigration concern. First, the subject isn't that there is not any such concern as jobs that folk who can artwork right here legally are unwilling to do, the subject is that those workers could desire to be paid a minimum of minimum salary, or a minimum of extremely compensated for his or her artwork. i be attentive to a lot of people, the two voters and criminal immigrants, who're at the instant jobless, no longer on welfare, and shortage of existence to discover a minimum salary interest doing something. tell me a job that people would not do, and that i will discover a minimum of 5 adult men who i be attentive to that are prepared to do it... LEGALLY. i assume in short, those people who're prepared to interrupt our regulations to get indexed under are doing it to make a extra effectual existence for themselves and their families. So it may be defeating the purpose to flow right here and proceed to take substandard jobs, for little pay. enable’s look at history, look at different third and 4th era immigrants and that could desire to provide you a concept of what could ensue whilst they exchange into legalized. look at ho the of the toddlers, and grand toddlers of those hardworking adult men and girls who got here right here via boat, survived interior the direction of the melancholy, droughts, and different good value mess ups at the instant stay. i think of it quite is how those destiny generations could be, on universal, extra effectual than the single in the previous. From a criminal immigrant, who waited over 6 years to get right here legally, spent 5 extra years interior the U. S. defense force to earn my citizenship, and is at the instant on the waiting checklist, attempting to get my sister right here, LEGALLY.
2016-11-26 00:27:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it is not correct. Immigration rules are being revised to patch any probable holes in the current structure.
2007-06-05 01:39:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ramesh M 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes they are come one come all, the rule of law no longer,
applies to illegals.
2007-06-05 01:52:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No not citizenship maybe a visa.Here's a link on discussion of it.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?link=best&qid=20070604202151AArxnDx&r=w&pa=F5xxBXHpPmKSlmhy00sKmVtD1jpy1yWyWXdzVQjqAPN0Hjxq9hIKlQ--&paid=choose_best
2007-06-05 01:54:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Visit this website - www.dhs.gov
2007-06-05 01:38:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by leadershipceo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋