2007-05-29 21:18:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No.
Jesus founded the Nazarenes/Gnostics to rally people against the Sadducees and their history of double speak and worshipping demons they claimed as God.
See:
http://one-faith-of-god.org/new_testament/apocrypha/nazarenes/nazarenes_0010.htm
Paul of Tarsus founded christianity to counter the message of Jesus and distort its meaning.
http://one-faith-of-god.org/new_testament/apocrypha/founders_christianity/founders_christianity_0010.htm
The Romans had nothing to do with the agenda of Jesus.
2007-05-29 21:21:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If you read the closest things to records of Jesus' life that we have (the bible) you'll see Jesus had lots of opportunities to bash the Romans but didn't take any of them. For example, there was time he was asked if paying taxes to Rome was right and he said yes. The fact he wasn't a revolutionary is further evidenced by the fact that the Romans didn't really want to execute him (they tend to want to execute anyone who might be a revolutionary.) The chief priests actually had to convince the Romans to execute Jesus.
2007-05-30 04:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by CCC 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While he did chose some zealots to be part of the 12. Jesus himself chose another path. The temptation would have been for Him to lead a revolution and kick Rome out of Israel, but He had a different mission: Beat death and Hell.
2007-05-30 04:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Future Citizen of Forvik 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The Jews wanted him to be that but , he had other stuff to , like save the world. I actually seem to promote Governmental ruling, "Give unto Cesar what is Cesar , and unto God what is Gods". Also In Romans 13, the bible show submission to authority
2007-05-30 04:27:49 · answer #4 · answered by Gman 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not even certain that Jesus was.... but if he was, being a revolutionist wouldn't have been outside possibility - as the story goes, he was killed as an enemy of the Roman Empire, wasn't he.
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.
2007-05-30 04:26:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - there has been that hypothesis and indeed that is where some of the proof of his existence comes from. Roman records of rebellions
2007-05-30 04:22:45 · answer #6 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying jesus was revolting?
2007-05-30 04:22:23 · answer #7 · answered by bastard 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am unable to decide what was revolting.
2007-05-30 04:21:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-05-30 04:26:04 · answer #9 · answered by allahdevil1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!
2007-05-30 04:22:33 · answer #10 · answered by God is love. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋