When people in the "Pregnancy" section of Y!A talk about their *baby*, asking questions about it's development in utero, etc... and then turn around and argue that it's not a human baby, it's a fetus or a clump of tissue?
I'm not dissing pregnant mothers... just mad at the hypocrisy.
2007-05-29 14:03:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Did you know that the first feminists were pro-life? Susan B. Anthony most definitely was- she called it "child-murder."
2007-05-29 16:35:19 · update #1
according to Jesus himself he knows all of us when we are in the womb. Then that means life begins at the moment of conception. i would like to see the look on all these women that come face to face with the babies that they aborted
2007-05-29 14:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Tommiecat 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Human beings with the ability to justify anythng they want? Naw, it'll never happen.
I'm fond of the Christians that hang out in the Tattoo section telling everyone there about how modifying your body in any way is an abomination unto the Lord, and then talking about how many piercings they have in the Fashion section.
Hypocrisy is everywhere, dear, and the weak use it as a weapon.
2007-05-29 21:17:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it ironic and sad. I suppose its all in how you look at things. When a woman is committed to her unborn child it is a baby. When a woman wants nothing more than for the child to never have existed, it is a clump of tissue. Semantics to try to make choices more palatable.
2007-05-29 21:08:49 · answer #3 · answered by future dr.t (IM) 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It would be hypocrisy if the same users who asked questions about their "baby" were the ones who argued that it wasn't a human. YES.
2007-05-29 21:07:06 · answer #4 · answered by MyPreshus 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, they say that a "fetus" is not a living human because it could not survive on its on. if you took a newborn into the court room of the supreme court and no one fed it it would die, so does that give anyone the right to walk up at shoot it and it not be murder?
2007-05-29 21:53:45 · answer #5 · answered by June M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I find it ironic that anyone who "supports the sanctity of human life" would also support an unjustified "war on terror".
I also find it ironic that there are any feminists against reproductive choice.
Oh, and I find it extremely telling that this question has been placed in the "Religion and Spirituality" section. ;)
2007-05-29 22:33:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I bet you've eaten "veal" before..! The best veal is from an unborn calf..!
Every animal foetus, and every adult animal are "clumps of tissue", why should christians be any different..?
2007-05-29 21:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do find that hypocritical. The same way people are pro-life yet pro-death penalty and pro-war...
2007-05-29 21:06:34 · answer #8 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
to me, it's a baby from the moment of conception. calling the baby a fetus seems so cold and clinical, almost evil sounding.
It's a baby. a very tiny person.
2007-05-29 21:07:51 · answer #9 · answered by Squirrley Temple 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I do find that hypocritical. The same way people are pro-abortion yet anti-death penalty and anti-war...
2007-05-29 21:07:52 · answer #10 · answered by kazmania_13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋