Senator XXXXX,
I'm disturbed, to say the least, by your vote for cloture on the Bush-Kennedy-Kyle "No Illegal Alien Left Behind Act of 2007" ... better known as "comprehensive immigration reform".
I spoke with a woman in your office who told me you voted for cloture so that the issue could be debated. Could you please tell me which Senate rule forbids debating the issue before the cloture vote? You see, I understand that your cloture vote actually limited debate on this monstrosity to just 30 hours.
I can't express to you, without resorting to extreme profanity and invectives, just how strongly I object to the amnesty and guest worker provisions in this bill. Then, at the request of the White House, the requirement that illegal aliens pay back income taxes as a condition of their amnesty was left out of the bill. "It would be too hard for the IRS to figure out how much they owe," is what White House press secretary Tony Snow said.....(continued)
2007-05-29
11:09:59
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Yak Rider
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Senator, I suggest you not file your taxes and see how much trouble the IRS has in computing how much they think you owe.
I'm also highly unimpressed by the fees and fines the bill purports to impose on illegal aliens, so don't tout them in your response to me. I understand, and so do you, that as soon as this bill is passed a movement will gain steam to waive, or outright repeal, the fines and fees on the grounds that they are excessive. Your collogue from Florida and Republican Party General Chairman, Senator Martinez, has already started the ball rolling and I'm sure Teddy Kennedy will be happy to cosponsor it. I'm sure the moron in the White House would be glad to repeal the fees and fines too, after all, family values don't stop at the Rio Grande you know.
Senator, do you know how the party's base feels about this issue? Do you care? Are you aware of the reception Senators Lindsey Graham and Saxby Chambliss got back in their home states during meetings of the party faithful?
2007-05-29
11:11:25 ·
update #1
All that was missing was the tar and feathers.
Why don't you schedule a few town hall meetings across the state and see how well your pro-amnesty vote is going over with your constituents? (Tip- have a fast car waiting outside with the motor running.)
I suppose my writing you will make no difference. It's my educated guess that this bill, or something equally as bad, will be passed and signed into law. It's got something for everybody. Big business Republicans will get millions upon millions of poorly educated workers from the third world to drive wages down and socialist Democrats will get millions upon millions of new voters to shower with public benefits ... and please, don't tell me this bill forbids them to collect public benefits. I'm sure you understand that their babies will be eligible for the full range of public benefits starting at birth and a decade or so down the line, after they've become citizens, so will the amnesty recipients.
2007-05-29
11:12:30 ·
update #2
The Heritage Foundation, using reliable well established methods, has computed the taxpayers cost to be approximately $2.5 trillion dollars over the next twenty to thirty years.
William McCarthy
United States Navy, Retired
2007-05-29
11:13:00 ·
update #3