English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He was a contempory of Jesus but never followed Jesus while He lived.

When Jesus walked the Earth, He never built a church or spoke to his congregation in a church. In fact, His visit to the Temple wound up as fight with priests and money changers. After Paul and his dream of keys to heaven and Earth, Christian priests became the same kind of gate-keepers as Jewish priests before them.

Didn't Paul keep his oath to destroy the spirit of Jesus' congregation?

2007-05-29 10:38:32 · 3 answers · asked by Owl Eye 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

3 answers

Nah, he got bumped on the head by a photon beam and became a missionary. People change.

2007-05-29 10:42:04 · answer #1 · answered by mutantw 2 · 0 0

a. he did meet Jesus later, and was even taken to heaven before he died.

b. Jesus himself called Paul his chosen vessel (Act 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: )

c. Paul bashing is nothing new, Peter wrote about it nearly 2000 years ago: (2 Peter 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.)

2007-05-29 10:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 0 0

Oh relatively I undergo in strategies a instructor telling me as quickly as that the church had stated this on call comprehend and ettiquite: we are able to be reported as "Mormons" and that's ok. and we are able to assert you're a "Mormon" and that i'm a "Mormon". "Mormonism" is likewise ok, on account this is our "ism." we could no longer say we prepare Latter-Day-Saintism, see? what they do no longer want us to call this is "the Mormon church" or "i'm a ingredient of the LDS Church." As for "LDS," by using fact the entire acronym could be so long it may defeat the purpose, "LDS" by myself is positive. via preserving that we are LDS, we propose that we are latter day saints of the Church of Jesus Christ. It nevertheless is desirable and shows comprehend. even although many different names desirable, of direction the main comprehend could certainly be to state that we are contributors of the "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day saints." or basically "we belong to the Church of Jesus Christ" to simplify haha. wish that replaced into comprehensible and that it helped! have a solid evening!

2016-11-23 15:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by vanwie 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers