English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Russia got new missiles in their nuclear arsenal. It says it is capable to penetrate defense shield. What do you think?

2007-05-29 07:14:27 · 11 answers · asked by dk 6 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

So much for Star Wars ( Strategic Defense Initiative). Why are we going to be doing this again? Anyway, this is what we get for deciding to ignore the treaty we had with them. It figures.

2007-05-29 07:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1 0

I think it is very sad for a country like Russia to waste money on intercontinental missiles when they are so poor at home. Many Russian families live on less than $50 dollars US a month. I have been there and the Russian people are good people they just have a government that does not know how to set its priorities. Their roads and infrastructures are terrible and here they waste money on missiles that will probably never be fired in defense.

2007-05-29 07:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Is this something new or is this an improvement on missiles they had since the Sixties?. If a stealth fighter is invisible to air defenses, why cant a missile. Russians and Americans have had intercontinental missile capabilities, since 60s- 70s,even capabilities to launch them from satelites..

2007-05-29 07:27:27 · answer #3 · answered by Dragon'sFire 6 · 0 1

in the final 7 years the Russian monetary gadget had grown, they even paid the old u.s. debt. the assumption of a sparkling chilly conflict is faulty the XXI century grant different subject: A multipolar worldwide the place diverse cultures of the capitalism attempt to be the great ability. Now we are able to work out us of a, eu Union, Russia, China, Japan and India as super ability in finished competence in the protection rigidity and in the monetary. The conflict in iraq made Russia and China spend money of their protection rigidity forces and are in touch in a sparkling technology of weapons made it to defeat us of a. Europe is in the communicate for a more suitable eu variety and get the management of the west returned. us of a is dealing with that their military is getting older and the is caught. the recent multipolar worldwide as not something in uncomplicated with chilly conflict or the satisfied 90s. the recent Russian monetary gadget (starting to be 5% in step with twelve months the third in the wordl) has adequate money to made new missiles and end the U. S. strengthen. they're arming Iran. Russia will continuously attempting to get effect in eastern europe with the aid of fact is slavic land. many human beings dont comprehend not something approximately Russia. The old soviet republics weren't conquered by potential of the comunist, those territories have been the legacy of the duchs of Moscow, the orthodox pathriarcs and the tsars

2016-10-30 02:47:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Many people have kept a weary eye toward the Bear. sleeping bears have a habit of waking up and Russia should only have to worry about two things.

The citizens wanting more changes, and some of their own home grown terrorists buddies like Iran, striking back because they too are the Great Satan and are not Islamic.

America needs to watch them and China, because neither are to be trusted.

2007-05-29 07:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 0 1

Russia used to have ten of thousands of high tech nukes. Look where it got them.

2007-05-29 08:44:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They can't maintain their current arsenal, their aging systems are what concerns me and their increased risk for accidental launches or diversion to rogue or terrorist states.

2007-05-29 15:47:38 · answer #7 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 2

a little un-nerving,, u never know what those soviets are thinking.. i think there still mad at losing the cold war.. but either way,, were America and we will take care of them

2007-05-29 07:24:02 · answer #8 · answered by katalystxxl 2 · 0 2

everyone has the right to arm themselves so long as they are responsible about it and have no intent to do damage to others

2007-05-29 07:30:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Let them waste their money...

That is how they lost the cold war...

That is the way the US follows presently

2007-05-29 07:18:11 · answer #10 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers