The fact that diseases change over time, which can include developing the ability to be transmitted between species, is evidence of evolution.
2007-05-29 05:33:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. The existence of zoonotic diseases is not proof, let alone a particularly good evidence.
Specific cases where the crossing over is known (ie: only affects dogs, then suddenly starts affecting people) might count, but in general, no.
2007-05-29 12:32:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they can, cats can get most of the things humans can. It is proof of evolution and that we all come from the same place/common ansestor. That is just how god caused evolution to happen.
2007-05-29 12:32:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aztrik 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The better question would be is mutation evidence of evolution and adaption? I believe it is.
The Ol' Hippie Jesus Freak
Grace, Peace and Love in Christ
Peg
2007-05-29 12:32:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dust in the Wind 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is no proof of evolution, nor for Christianity because neither can be reproduced, so that is why it is called faith.. you must believe or in something you can not prove or disprove..
2007-05-29 12:40:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by blazingbulldog 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This only proves that disease is caused by demons as the bible tells us, rather than bacteria or vruses as evolutionists like to claim. Demons sometimes choose animals as their hosts.
2007-05-29 12:33:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shared DNA can simply suggest a common language used by a common designer.
2007-05-29 12:33:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Edward J 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why, because we are both susceptible to the same microorganism that has been around longer than either of us?
2007-05-29 12:32:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you could explain the rapport ...something might be said.
So far, I believe you think that because we can chop down a tree, (and that trees can fall on us) therefore we were once part of trees.
2007-05-29 12:31:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Uncle Thesis 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
It only proves that diseases and viruses can mutate.
In and of themselves, they cannot support life.
Adaptation is not evolution.
2007-05-29 12:35:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bobby Jim 7
·
0⤊
2⤋