are we different from animals?

Question

Are we really that different from the animals in the wild? We are territorial. We must reproduce. We have complex family systems. We have preadtors and prey. The only difference between us and the animals is that we feel the inate need to try to explain our exsitence instead with the supernatural instead of just living it. We feel superior because we have complex language to describe our "feelings" Your thoughts

by the way i think we are just barely different from animals

Answer 1

Man was able to survive because of his rapidly evolving intelligence. We have no great natural defenses against being the prey of other animals....but intelligence gave us an ability to protect ourselves against predators and the elements. Otherwise we'd have disappeared long ago. Our intelligence has now grown to the point where we can connect the world through computers and build bombs large enough to destroy our planet. Our defense mechanism has now turned into our potential demise. Apparently, we got a little too good at thinking. We're still animals....but we're the only ones with the power to destroy us all.

Answer 2

I think that I have a cognitive thought process, knowledge of self, understanding , logical reasoning, and creative abilities,

which makes me a Superior being, I know you can teach a monkey or an ape to do just about anything, however, The day one creates a symphony or the day an animal does anything outside of survive in the wild independent of mans help, I acknowledge them as my equal,

when was the last time you saw a lion painting in the Sahara??? never, they don't its not needed for them to survive,

when was the last time you saw a deer that realized, hey that's a big a** loud thing about to hit my A**, I should move, never, you wont,

so just by common sense(something apparently strictly inherent to man on a limited basis) I am a superior being,

Answer 3

You are forgetting man's desire to kill for sport, not for food or protection. I wonder sometimes about the "complex language" to describe our feelings, when no one seems to be able to listen to anyone else.
Maybe it is the animals that are evolving and mankind is just rotting away.
Maybe science can find the missing link, once the dolphins or mice take over the earth.

Answer 4

How can any person moderately think Noah would probably collect 2 of each and every specie to position at the ark?!? Think of the time that could be required to stroll the whole earth and to sail the robust oceans to collect 2 of each and every specie. Moreover, he could then have to get them to comply with him. He could have got to feed them. Many of the species could die earlier than they ever achieve the ark. The planet isn't an excessively hospitable location to many species as soon as they're eliminated from their common habitat. According to the UN Biodiversity programme†: "To date, round a million.7 million species were learned and defined. This roster of recognized species is particular to be just a fraction of the whole quantity. ... In reality, there are most likely 15 to twenty unnamed tropical species for each named one." Thus, despite the fact that we be given the scale back restrict of recognized species, Noah could have needed to collect they all. It isn't whatever you'll be able to simply do in a lifestyles time, so much much less one hundred lifetimes. Ah, possibly he had Santa Claus-like powers and used to be competent to droop time. As for the splendid-continent argument, Pangaea‡ (identify of the splendid-continent) existed 250 million years in the past, now not fewer than 6000 years in the past. So so much for the argument that Noah would have walked the entire earth to collect the species. Noah could have by some means have had to arrive Australia, New Zealand, Galapagos, amongst a myriad of alternative islands to collect the ones species, too. (Does that imply Noah used to be the primary to circumnavigate the globe?!?) How precisely does one provide an explanation for this? I believe the questioner, that you'll be able to think within the Christian God (which I don't) even as nonetheless accepting the recommendations at the back of evolution. The 2 needn't be incompatible.

Answer 5

This is an argument that I use often. When one looks at undesirable behavior we can often see it mirrored in animal behavior. For example homosexuality: it exists in the animal world, drug usage; animals seek out fermented fruit to get a buzz, violence: big cats (and domestic) kill offspring of rival males and so on. We are very much animals in all sense on the word.

Answer 6

Animals have a much more complex language ability that most people will ever suspect.

Answer 7

There certainly are differences between humans and other animals. No other animal can manufacture hair dryers, for example.

Answer 8

I am still waiting for animals to invent or find a renewable energy source or nonpolluting engine

Answer 9

We are complex animals. We are the only species that kills for fun though. I don't know how superior that is.

Answer 10

We are really only different in that we have a consciousness of the earth and the universe and the idea of a creator God.