If "Creationism" is true, who can we sue?

Question

Every man whose brain was not washed by Pat Robertson's demagogy knows pretty well that creationism is nonsense because it is contradictory to scientific evidence.

So, actually it seems to be useless, but the next step of creationism is on the way:

HIV, earthquakes, hurricanes and storms are sent by god because you are all bad and did not obey your sermonizer.

Now, THAT is where they want us. It is about dominating us and getting donations.

But maybe there is hope in the pestilence named "lawyers"?

If "intelligent design" were true, couldn't we sue all folds and sermonizers as origins of HIV, earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, floods, cancer.... ?

Well, if it is THEIR god who sends natural disaster and diseases, invalidity and even death itself, isn't he liable?

---
Sophie, that is so killingly funny... did God even create me and this question then?

----
"So, if you want to sue someone, sue Eve..."

Man, who created Eve and her sin?

---
"And a lot of that evidence points to Creation not Evlolution."

It is always good to know that you will find a "scientist" that proves what you want to be proven. One in one million scientists will falsify results until the other 999,999 scientists can be discredited.

No, is this funny or sad?

Please, prove that the earth is flat.

Answer 1

Religion uses God to explain what happes, not to make things happen. So you must sue God, which appears to me as a tricky issue.

However, if some uses their religion to convince you that something wrong is true, and you make a fatal descision based on this conviction, then you possibly may have a case.

A few years ago it was a case in Sweden where a priest convinced a woman that it was a wish from God that she should kill his wife, which she did The priest ended up in jail, the killer in a hospital.

Answer 2

You're a little off base. First off, science can't prove creation or evolution. For a proof, you need an expirament that is repeatable and observable. So, you're wrong there. Also, creation fits the evidence just as neatly, if not more-so, than evolution.

HIV, earthquakes....... - all results of the fall of man. The world was perfect before sin entered.

So, if you want to sue someone, sue Eve...

Answer 3

Science is incapable of explaining the 6 days of creation.
Science deals with experiments that can be conducted in a lab.

Any thing that can not be reprduced in a lab is called a theory.

Yes, that means that creation story is also a theory.

So we only have forenzic evidence to go by.
And a lot of that evidence points to Creation not Evlolution.

Examples:
1) human and dinosaur foot prints in the same rock(the Bible says we lived together, evolution says that we lived millions of years apart)
2) the ice from the "ice age" is centered over the magnetic poles and not the axis poles (the Bible says that there was an ice shield over our atmosphere and it collapsed during the flood. Ice at -300F has a magnetic property. That is why the ice caps from the ice age are center on the magnetic poles.)
3) woolly mamoths were frozen to the core before they even started to rot inside, plus the tropical pods in their stomachs were not digested (even at -100F a mamoth would have started to rot before it had a chance to freeze completly, and how could it be eating tropical pods if it lived in an artic enviroment?).

Answer 4

God is not a God of logic and science. He can't be explained away through tests and experiments. He is a God of faith. Only faith can save you. Besides, you can sue the creator, he created the lawyers. That would be biting the hand that fed them.

Answer 5

Sorta like second-hand smoke.

Answer 6

you said Pat Robertson....you lost me at Pat Robertson

why, oh why didn't "the lord" take him with Jerry Falwell?

Answer 7

I'd like a prostate that won't start failing when I get older!