Since it takes less raw materials to make a miniskirt, shouldn't its wear be encouraged over that of full length skirts? :)
How about speedos over swimming trunks?
2007-05-24 08:38:18 · 14 answers · asked by TK-421 3 in Environment ➔ Green Living
In the spirit of conservation, yes it would take less material. But in addition, miniskirts actually beautify the surrounding areas.
2007-05-24 08:45:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My understanding is that the the mini skirt evolved because of a shortage of fabric , after World War 2 ;I think the bikini was also popularised around the same time. I think it would probably encourage waste in the modern day;most women feel the need to remove hair from any exposed leg, so the more they show the more waste would be generated ie. disosable razors , wax , whatever . Also it might encourage a greater use of stockings;so even if that just full pantyhose instead of kneee highs, more waste would be produced.Especially when you factor in much more likely that it is to put a hole in full length stockings.
2007-05-24 14:24:50 · answer #2 · answered by sendmeo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In our culture, the answer is questionable, largely depending on climate.
Too many questions. What material is it made from? What type of dyes? What pollutants from the manufacturing process? Do they ship efficiently?....
Then the user, how often does she shave? (more manufacturing/shipping/resale environmental questions here) Will she consume more food because she is cold and requires more caloric intake to stay warm? Perhaps more cuts and scratches on exposed legs? More dirt collects, increasing frequency of bathing?
Don't think the average person should split hairs on enviro stuff while the rich are still swimming in gluttony. Just be common-sensible and you'll be fine.
Let's just all move someplace warm and go nekkid :)
2007-05-24 19:31:55 · answer #3 · answered by j.west 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure about the whole speedo thing, since those things are made out of acrylic or whatever and never decompose...but sure, miniskirts are always nice to see.
but then, i suppose in the whole "save some clothe" line of thought, guys should wear kilts then. Now that would be scary.
2007-05-24 09:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by TigerWriter 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can see a good argument for shorter skirts in warm weather, but in colder weather, they work against the environment. This is because they cover less leg and the woman (or in this day and age, in some cases, the guy) will need to turn up the thermostat in order to stay warm. If she gets chilled, then she can get sick and use up a ton of tissues.
2007-05-24 10:02:45 · answer #5 · answered by thezaylady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhh, I wouldn't want to see George W. Bush in a Speedo, or Hillary Clinton in a miniskirt! LOL
2007-05-24 09:24:08 · answer #6 · answered by Pink1967 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Speedos are nasty and they are made from synthetic material which somehow is produced and all factories pollute, so the cotton swimsuits are better. Miniskirts are great if you can get away with them.
2007-05-24 09:25:29 · answer #7 · answered by kyeann 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes to the mini skirts, great idea, but a big definite no on the speedos. Just recycle your old jeans into cut offs.
2007-05-24 09:57:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nice
2016-05-17 05:24:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would work except in colder weather. Then an additional garment would have to be worn defeating the purpose.
2007-05-25 00:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by Patti C 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋