1% of these are because of rape= 6% due to health of the mother, and 93% because of it being not the right time to have a child. Probably you have figured out from answers you have read that I have written and this question alone, that I am pro-life. But I am very interested to hear why you think it is ok to abort a baby at all especially just because you are not ready to parent?
2007-05-18
20:14:47
·
28 answers
·
asked by
AdoreHim
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey AJ have you seen pictures of aborted fetus' they look like babies to me. God also knew us long before we were in our mother's womb- and He created us. So if your child was less than a month old, as you say - and someone killed that baby what would you do? Say it is too young to be human? I doubt that seriously. If a "fetus" is not human until after birth, then why do women who have miscarriages grieve?
2007-05-18
20:29:28 ·
update #1
One question for Jamesmom- let me get this right. Did you say, that it should be allowed to have abortions so that babies will not grow up in orphanages and die? That almost sounds like the argument I heard from one of my son's teachers yesterday. He is doing a debate in government class on abortion- He is against- the teacher said, not a student but the teacher said- "Did you hear about the father who burned to death his baby in microwave? Parents like that who abuse their children should abort". As horrible as dying in orphanages and :microwaves is we have no right to not give the child a chance to live, We are murdering our children before the are born.
2007-05-18
20:34:09 ·
update #2
just to verify- 4,000 abortions a DAY not a year. I know that seems huge , but it is true. That number is all over the internet, and in books that I have read- it is a holocaust
2007-05-18
20:37:42 ·
update #3
Please Jen-This is not meant to be rude, but I am adopted and have 2 adopted kids- do not put adoption down- this is why more women are having abortions because of the lies that are being fed to people about adoption. Life is precious-
2007-05-18
20:41:08 ·
update #4
Printninja= thank you so much for knowing my life history- I myself am adopted and have 2 adopted children. By the way there are more couples in america waiting for babies, that cannot adopt because there are so few women placing for adoption anymore. Also I have counseled women who are considering abortion, and when adoption is mentioned most are not interested.
2007-05-18
20:50:11 ·
update #5
I know...I read that too, and I was apalled.
4,000 innocent babies slaughtered every day, it is unthinkable...it is unimaginable.
It might sound naive, but 4,000 women get pregnant with unwanted babies every day? 4,000 men getting these women pregnant? I mean, that's just...rather hard to understand. Doesn't ANYBODY use birth control? Are ALL the condoms broken? Has sex really gotten this out of control? How did this happen?
To answer your question, no. At least 93% of those abortions are insupportable. There is no way to justify murdering those helpless little ones. It is shocking to think that the most dangerous place in America for a child is in his own mother's womb....
Makes me think that, perhaps we ought to take God's name out of the pledge of allegiance, and out of anything else that has to do with a country that kills children. As I recall, nations that sacrifice their babies to an idol were not very popular with God. The idol our babies are being sacrificed to is named Selfish, and it is a very cruel god indeed.......
2007-05-18 20:55:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think the (93%) can't be Justified....
When Msulims Slith lambs in their feast for food.. It's "Barbarian.. Savage" "Heartless" "How can Muslims kill a helpless creature for their own joy? That's a Massacre!".. But when 3800 Woman each year have sex for her own joy, and gets pregnant, then it's ok to kill the helpless HUMAN inside her.. Researches have proved that a baby in the woman laugh.. feel, cry.. and sleep... It is a creature more advanced that a goat.. but what can we say about the baised, double view, Pschizopphrenic media?
What does it mean to "not ready to be a parent?" means you're 5 years old for instance? If it means the lack of money, we all know that US gov - and I respect it for that - pay an indemnification to poor parents to raise the baby... What else aren't a woman ready in?
Imagine you got a Job in the United Nations, or the Presidency office; would you refuse it because: you are not ready?
Killing a helpless baby that waits to feel you tenderness, a creature whose music for 9 months were only your heart beatings, and for what? Just because you Can!!
2007-05-18 21:19:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lawrence of Arabia 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No it is a holocaust, there have been over forty million abortions performed in the United States alone and the death toll is still rising.
It is a worse holocaust then the one the Jews suffered of over six million.
This murderous killing must be stopped.
These people can't even defend their selves, are totally innocent of any and all wrong doing and are alive upon conception.
As with any other murderer they should be put in prison for these murders.
It is a child not a choice. It is not a woman's body it is the baby's body. These defenseless baby's need people to protect them, how many more murders must be committed before a stop is put to this holocaust?
2007-05-18 20:25:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mariah 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Most of the kids up for adoption are nonwhite, disabled, older and male. They usually don't get adopted. People wait five years or longer for healthy, 'normal', white baby newborn girls. I don't want to see crack addicts and women with HIV not getting no prenatal care but having children. No amount of P.C. rhetoric about aborting a disabled child will change my mind. If there is no home, no help and no desire on the part of the parent(s) to care for the child, he will be abandoned. Sticking kids in foster care or orphanages is fundamentally wrong if there are (could have been) better alternatives, like family reunification, custody with other relatives, respite care, parenting courses and adoption. It is an imperfect world.
This leads back to abortion. I am not against it. I don't consider a fetus under twelve weeks to be viable. Independent life is an aphorism. We all depend on the air, food supply, capitalist market system, jobs, water supply and health care system. A baby must be fed: he is dependent on his mother and father. He is not independent. He is a human being when born. I don't really agree with several abortions. With partial birth, it is a scary but debatable issue.
On a recent CBC Canada documentary, a woman who had four abortions while being a drug addict decided to become militantly pro-life and opposed all legal abortion, calling it 'murder'. If it is such a thing, why isn't she in jail, or does she not apply her own line of logic to herself? Why is she allowed to have four state-subsidized legal abortions? Why not a woman who makes a mistake? She is not allowed to have one or else, risk her life, fertility and jail? People do make mistakes.
Most women do not have several abortions. Maybe the government should only cover one and then, (any others) for a restricted set of reasons. How can this woman not practice what she preaches? She's going around to women's health clinics with a fetus in a jar and yelling at women? Why is she harassing them and calling their houses? Her actions are wrong. Nobody should be harassed. Sometimes, the pro-lifers set up an agency right beside a clinic and can get within fifty feet.
2007-05-18 20:23:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Tell you what sweetheart... how about you adopt these 4000 unwanted fetuses? You find surrogate mothers to carry them to term. You find foster parents to raise them, feed them, shelter them, put them through college and ensure they become healthy, well adjusted members of society, and I'll agree we should stop aborting them. You go before congress and tell them we need to raise taxes to fund the construction of all the new orphanages to accommodate all these babies (and their needs) until they're adopted. You try and find pediatricians and nurses coming out of med school who will take the wonderfully low paying govt. jobs caring for these children. You figure out how to deal with the burden on the public education system (and we all know how well orphans are accepted in public schools.)
And before you shout adoption, show me all the normal, non-dysfunctional foster homes for the thousands of non-white, non-English speaking, uneducated, adolescent males that are already languishing in orphanages.
See, this is the problem with you soapbox, bible-thumping right-to-lifers. All you know how to do is whine and cry about what is immoral, but none of you have practical, affordable solutions for the problems associated with a million unwanted babies being born each year (most of which are in 3rd world nations where a great many will starve to death anyway because the mother's have insufficient nutrition to lactate.)
Offer a solution, then spout your bilge!
2007-05-18 20:43:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
it truly is unquestionably extremely common and extremely logical. moral judgements are in accordance with increasing happiness and reducing suffering. An embryo has no information, no information, so an abortion does no longer reason suffering for the embryo. Now, it would want to reason a particular quantity of emotional soreness for the mother who has the abortion, yet dissimilar that's by using the lies and guilt laid on human beings by technique of the conservatives who want to inform human beings the thanks to stay their lives. It can also in simple terms as surely convey happiness to the female who does no longer want to attend to having a baby less than the given circumstances. If the mission is considered logically, contained in the gentle of purpose moral criteria, conserving abortion criminal will develop happiness and decreases suffering. now and again a woman decides to terminate her being pregnant, instead of bringing it to time period. it truly is a lengthy way better perfect that this be saved criminal, then that many undesirable toddlers be further into the international. the international is already overpopulated besides. by technique of what good judgment is it morally better perfect to limit abortion and stress women to have undesirable toddlers? that's insane! The 3100 American troops and six hundred,000 Iraqis who've died considering that Bush released his lie-depending conflict were all stay, unsleeping human beings. the quantity of suffering that the standard Iraqi now reports on a daily basis is undesirable and is an instantaneous results of Bush's lie-depending conflict. maximum folk of persons injured or killed in this conflict were possibility free civilians, in simple terms sufferers who had no selection contained in the evil that became inflicted on them as consequently of the Bush's lie-depending conflict. the 1000's of 1000's of troops and civilians who've suffered everlasting injuries because the outcome of Bush's lie-depending conflict are unsleeping, residing those who're suffering.
2016-11-04 10:14:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No abortion is justified, because it constitutes the killing of an innocent human life (whereas, the death penalty, when properly applied, constitutes the taking of the life of someone heneously guilty).
When a society thinks that it is alright to take the life of an innocent person (or commit an injustice of any sort against an innocent person), then it is finished!!!
The spiraling violence in our society (I nearly got mugged outside of my motel room this evening), is the dirty rotten fruit of legalized and socially accepted abortion "rights."
The reason for this is obvious to anyone who still has the faculty of reason - that reason that has not been destroyed through a habit of mortal sin.
For if it is OK to commit an injustice against another to get what you want in life, then anything goes ..........
Get it???
A society *must* be founded upon justice to persons, or else it is invalid.
.
2007-05-18 20:27:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
1% of these are because of rape= 6% due to health of the mother, and 93% because of it being not the right time to have a child
Those statistics are not for yearly totals not daily.
God says
Proverbs 8:36
"But he who sins against me wrongs his own soul;
All those who hate me love death.”
2007-05-18 20:24:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by ronald s 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO it can not be, Jesus Christ the second member of The Godhead said Himself in Matt. 19:18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Jesus used the correct wording used in Exodus 20:13 Thou shalt not kill.
find out more what The Holy Bible teaches free bible lessons www.amazingfacts.org email me also wgr88@yahoo.com God bless
2007-05-18 20:22:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by wgr88 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I do not think it is ever justified to abort a fetus or embryo. As soon as the sperm fertilizes the egg, a new human being with its own DNA is created. In fact, an "unborn" baby has its own heart, blood supply, and DNA. It is NOT the woman's body, so it is not her choice.
2007-05-18 20:20:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Michelle 2
·
5⤊
3⤋