Why didn't Jesus just write the New Testament himself?

Answer 1

He did.

But many of his writings were lost.

Many others were burned after the Roman emperor Constantine ordered it so.

The rest were disregarded after the Ecumenical Council of Nicaea voted against several of the ideas his existence put forth. It did so to deify his existence and create a more powerful image to rally support for Christianity.

Answer 2

As the question implies, Jesus did not physically sit down and write what He wrote. He was the inspiration and the Holy Spirit counseled, but no book in the Bible is one that you can say Jesus actually wrote.

You will find that many confuse the putting together of the cannon with actually writing the text therefore the writing pre-dated 325 when the cannon was put together. The purpose was to save those written by either an Apostle or someone that wrote on behalf of the Apostle.

Those that wrote the Bible often referred to those who were still alive to verify the accuracy of the text. And since we have copies that date back to the first century. So why would we make translations of the translations and risk losing some of the meaning when we could use the first century documents? Many who criticize the Bible at this point fail to bother to test their theory.

If compared with other documents held to be accurate of that era, then there are more copies and less distortions between copies. As a matter of fact, the Bible can be used as a history book for this very reason. To put it another way, if you can't hold the Bible as being accurate, then forget history as a subject taught in school.

Hope this helps.

Answer 3

Several reasons come to mind:

He had only 3 years to fulfill his ministry.
How could he both write, & do all the things that he needed to do? If he was writing instead of doing, just what would he have written about?

Also, it is much easier to believe what many eyewitnesses say about someone, than what they say about themself. The Bible principle is that at least 2 witnesses are required to substantiate a fact. Christ Jesus & the issue of God's sovereignty are such important matters, however, that several more were used.
http://watchtower.org/library/w/2000/5/15/article_01.htm
There were 8 penmen of the Christian Greek Scriptures:
Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, James, Peter, Jude, & Paul.

Another possibility that may also hold true, is for the reason of avoiding giving people a book that they would want to worship, rather than worshipping God, himself. The Ark of the Covenant has also never been found, perhaps primarily for this reason.

Also:

"Love is long-suffering and kind. Love is not jealous, it *does not brag*, does not get puffed up..." --1 Corinthians 13:4

Many more would be calling him a braggart, if he had.
And that, too, would not be conducive to God's will.

(For more info, or, when a link's URL changes.) http://watchtower.org/search/search_e.htm

Answer 4

God can always do things better Himself than we ever could. But how would we learn if He did?

So you have 1 Luke where Jesus is training the disciples and 2 Luke (Acts) where the disciples are leading others through the power of the Holy Spirit. We are to continue that chain as commanded by the Great Commission.

Answer 5

He was illiterate (as someone else already said), and he wanted his message to gain force thru the memory of its existence. I mean, a story tends to get embellished, flowered up, as time passes. By the time it was written down, it was pretty worked up-- just what he wanted, right? The story of a dude who among hundreds at the time claimed to be the Messiah and was executed for sedition like thousands of others, or the story that survived longer than two or three years? Besides that, not everyone back then could read, so writing it down would not have gotten the story to people whom he wished to hear it. Having written documents about Jesus would have been the short route to having the papers burned and the holders executed without ever having passed the story along. Word of mouth was faster, safer, and much more accessible to the masses.

Answer 6

Jesus did not live long enough to write all of the New Testament.
Besides He was telling people how to live for God. Someone probably followed Him around and wrote what He said and did.

Answer 7

Religion hides the fact that during Biblical times, 99% of the people were illiterate. Only the wealthy were able to go to a school and acquire reading and writing skills. There is no record of Jesus attending a school.

Answer 8

because god follows a progression. He well-knownshows his note to his prophets and they write it down. that's the way it has continuously been and it truly is a progression that God maintains to adhere to. It became an same at the same time as Jesus became on earth, his disciples wrote down his teachings. as well the actuality that i trust it truly is a extreme-high quality testimony if his disciples wrote it fairly than Jesus. it would want to be extraordinary to have him write, "nicely as we talk I spoke to some Pharisees and that i had to set them immediately. I instructed them.... " in simple terms doesn’t artwork. the instructions are superior at the same time as written by technique of an observer. "contained in the mouth of two or 3 witnesses shall each note be common." (Matthew 18:16) it truly is likewise authentic that it would want to be confusing reading the Lord's note contained in the first individual fairly than the 0.33 individual. Like above that doesn’t artwork. Jesus wasn't in simple terms an elementary guy. If he became his lack of existence might want to were meaningless. He became God's purely begotten son, he became because it were God on earth. He over got here lack of existence and sin, and thanks to what he did we are able to repent and modify and lets be forgiven by the Atonement of Christ. As a loose present to all, we are able to all be resurrected as Christ became. It sounds such as you do not unavoidably trust. i wager that's ok, God has given us the liberty to pick and do what we are able to; even though it does no longer propose the we will be in a position to pick the outcome of our selections. My conception is that Jesus is the Christ and he got here to Earth and he suffered the pains and sins of the international that we'd stay, if we purely trust on him and stick with his commandments and undergo to the suitable. it isn't an elementary course, yet i trust it truly is the right course.

Answer 9

Then he wouldn't have gotten around to spreading the message he had to TEACH............besides, the New Testament is a man made concoction of what was deemed ACCEPTABLE for the faithful to read, doesn't mean it is all TRUE..............Christians will hate me for this one but the BIBLE as put together to this day is how "Roman Catholicism" put it together and those who REJECT this faith, haven't bother to SEE they follow the BOOK (New Testament) "they" CREATED...............nomatter WHAT they call themselves in christian belief............they are still CATHOLICS................at the ROOT of christian creation in DOCTRINE.....Some have said in here Jesus was "illiterate" but quite the "contrary." Jesus was a religious "scholar" who studied at Alexandria Egypt, the center at the time of learning for this was the place many went to get "educated." How else do you THINK Jesus was so astute on confronting the Pharisees and Sadducees? Just in all he KNEW of Jewish doctrine TELLS the FACT he was INTELLIGENT and READ all he knew to confront them. Why else do you think he started ministering at the age of "30........"

Answer 10

Would it really have made a difference for you? Besides it kind of contradicts his lowly origins. Jesus didn't really do anything historically significant (raised no army, wrote nothing, had no political office, etc) yet he is the central figure of history.