Are those who look forward to the amnesty bill going to applaude when the senate chokes the life out of the middle class by importing a peasant class to hold down wages?
2007-05-18 11:57:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Sen. Arlen (The Single-Bullet Theorist) Specter was on the radio saying the bill was for "restoring the rule of law." That is, making all the illegals legal. By the same thinking we ought to also legalize robbery and manslaughter. Just think how the crime rate would go down then!
Bijoux, you're dreaming. Paying for social security for all those who have entered illegally will cost the middle class 2.5 trillion dollars. This is the cost of what would be paid in benefits minus what the illegals are expected to have paid into the system.
And that's just social security. Add in prisons, education, and all social services and it gives the warm-hearted government lots of reasons why they have to raise and raise and raise taxes.
2007-05-18 12:13:26 · answer #1 · answered by Otto D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact there's a choose for clarifications first. There are not any professional unlawful or professional regulations human beings right here. Amnesty would be surpassed, regardless on the administration. And if no longer, the USA of a desires to return with a plan or a reform to verify the situation of unlawful immigration in a manner which could earnings the voters and protecting stable family. so far our usa don't have the acceptable public family with different international locations because of the fact the way u . s . cope with circumstances is with wars. The numbers of minorities is increasing, for the year 2035, they are going to be very just about no longer internet strengthen in non Hispanic whites. the government can't be blind So, an amnesty that replaced into no longer surpassed earlier could properly be bypass in a destiny, because of the fact no longer something is static in existence and a few human beings in united states of america of america are having no longer undemanding time accepting that. they elect united states of america of america to be like their ole stable time, and that isn't going to take place, those are unrealistic expectancies. And as quickly as we remind them, they get indignant, they think of that they are in a position to give up it, and that's immaturity or lack of expertise form their area, extremely of determining issues for the acceptable, they opt to be obdurate and whiners.
2017-01-10 07:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, normally people that are looking for amnesty aren't high powered, highly educated people, and the most jobs would be in the fields, or working in factories. I don't think the middle class has anything to worry about. Now people in their late 30's and up that haven't made up their mind to get an education and are in the fields, factories, etc, yea, they'll tremble....unfortunately. So I don't think there's anything to worry about.
2007-05-18 12:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by MzzandtheChuchuBees 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, because the Avocado Picker's Union has been a real boon to the middle class.
2007-05-18 12:01:13 · answer #4 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Actually, many of them are complaining it's not generous enough.
2007-05-18 12:13:26 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When was the last time you voted for anything?
2007-05-18 12:01:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋