English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it more important about who actually started WWII behind the scenes? Is it more important about 55 million killed during WWII? Is it more important to learn if FDR knew about Pearl Harbor in advance but did nothign to warn the commanders at Pearl Harbor? Is it more important to learn if America was tricked into WWII? Is it more important to learn about all the suffering and destruction that occurred during WWII, so maybe we will never have to deal with this again? Is it more important to learn who causes wars to begin with so maybe humanity will never have to deal with the death and suffering and the destruction of their beautiful cities? Or is it more important to just deal with what the Jews claimed that happened to them? I mean let's open that can of worms. Are the Jews just innocent people and had nothing to do with the WWII and they are the only ones that suffered because of this war? Or are the Jews the ones who financed and profited from the war? What is more important?

2007-05-18 11:49:39 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

Most important is a clear concise, well defined question that can be answered in this format.

2007-05-18 11:55:56 · answer #1 · answered by Noah Tall 4 · 5 0

To me here's what more important about that time period, something that the Allies did after WW2, but not 1. How to treat the enemy after the war. The real causes of WW2 start at the end of WW1 by the victors, Britain and France. It was the treaty forced upon Germany and her people that planted the seed which Hitler would come to power. Also remember, Hitler wasn't going to stop with the Jews, he had a supreme race in mind which he said would rule the world. It wasn't Asian, Indian, Muslim, African, black, yellow or red. His ideal race was white, blonde haired and blued eyed. If you were not that, guess what, you weren't going to make it very far in Hitler's world.

As for Pearl Harbor I've yet to read anything that states FDR 'knew' that PH would be attacked. I think he knew Japan would attack, but considering a lot of things I think he thought Japan would attack the Philippines or somewhere closer to Japan.

2007-05-19 09:47:17 · answer #2 · answered by rz1971 6 · 1 0

How dare you bring up such things. Truth is not important here!

I understand, yet I think you are falling into the same trap the rest of the world has. There always has to be a bad guy, and a good guy.

Reality doesn't work that way. Hitler had very lofty goals for what he did with Europe, trying first by diplomacy, then by alliances, then by war against those who opposed him, to unite Europe to keep the threat of the growing Soviet threat at bay. Patton agreed with that as well, and was ignored.

Yet, we still had to oppose it, just as we opposed the Soviet Union.

Reality is never that simple. The bad guys are not really the bad guys. The good guys aren't really the good guys.
All sides are trying to do what they think is right.

That doesn't mean we should oppose them!

Keep speaking up, regardless of who disagrees with you (myself included on many issues).

There's always more than one side to an issue. Learn the Jewish one. It may help.

2007-05-18 18:59:58 · answer #3 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 2

What's important is that it's over and done with and hopefully us, our children and our children's children will never have to deal with something like WWII again!

And for you to insinuate that the Jews had "claimed" their own demise and did so for the sake of "profit" is just plain ludacris!

2007-05-18 19:11:33 · answer #4 · answered by Chris S 3 · 2 0

Somebody's been reading WAY too much propaganda.

2007-05-22 03:11:13 · answer #5 · answered by Mad Scribbler 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers