English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If I buy a marked fair trade product, will 3rd world farmers get a better deal, or am I buying into a marketing ploy. Are some better / fairer than others and how do I tell?

2007-05-18 10:07:47 · 6 answers · asked by Grinning Football plinny younger 7 in Business & Finance Advertising & Marketing Other - Advertising & Marketing

6 answers

I think "Fair Trade" is a big con. It may give the actual growers a better price which increases their profit but, I doubt very much if any extra money is paid to the poorly paid that work in the fields. It is probably just the same as it is in this country where the top 20% get huge pay rises while the rest of us get 2%.

2007-05-18 10:21:46 · answer #1 · answered by Just William 6 · 0 0

I volunteer for an organization that swears by fair trade organizations. It is not unusual to hear bad press about these organizations as the media loves a good sensation. Overall I would recommend fair trade above all others. For the most part these companies do a good thing for the people who work for them and the money does get to the right people unlike some others that think slave labor is a way to do business.

2007-05-18 11:03:38 · answer #2 · answered by kjscrim 2 · 0 0

Some are better better than others. As you say they are not all they are cracked up to be.

Personally I buy items from companies that I believe to have ethical trading activities, e.g. clothes from Marks and Spencer.

2007-05-18 10:18:33 · answer #3 · answered by brian t 5 · 0 0

Vietnam replaced into an all-out conflict with hundreds of thousands of youthful men drafted and enlisted in uniform. The conflict sectors of the economic gadget could growth however the civilian sector languishes. lots cotton cloth replaced into used for militia outfits that there replaced right into a shortage of a few forms of civilian outfits. an identical is going for some nutrients products. for the duration of wars some human beings - the protection contractors - make a lot of money whilst the rustic's civilian desires are disregarded. additionally, wars are costly and lowering taxes whilst spending those greater desirable trillions on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drains the treasury and spells economic disaster. this is not "the troops" who could desire to be retaining "us". There could desire to be no separation, no branch of the yankee human beings into "troops" and "us". this is all people who could desire to be doing the battling. If a situation is important sufficient to deliver the militia, if this is that lots of plausible to our usa, then each in a position-bodied American could desire to be interior the combat.

2017-01-10 07:13:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There's been some controversy over this. The Fairtrade mark is the accepted standard, but some are saying that it doesn't guarantee enough standards.

See http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/consumer/story/0,,2076162,00.html

2007-05-18 10:16:33 · answer #5 · answered by Lobster 4 · 0 0

.I think they are all they are cracked up to be. And it is about time these people were helped instead of being exploited

2007-05-19 09:42:51 · answer #6 · answered by elaine s 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers