If we stop calling the universe "CREATION," will Fundamentalists stop insisting that it requires a "creator?"

Question

It's just the universe. It may or may not have an origin, but there's no evidence leading anyone to presume some disembodied intelligence from outside its bounds brought it into being.

So should we stop referring to home universe as "creation?"

Answer 1

lol, I agree totally. I don't call it creation anyway, but you make an EXCELLENT point.

Answer 2

Here we go with Fundamentalist Evolutionists calling names again.

Answer this question logically, and I will begin to seriously think of being an atheist or evolutionist.

After following Darwin's tree of life to the roots of the smallest living organism - where did that organism come from? Since
it is Darwin's theory that all life progresses in stages from pre-existing life or "random selection" - where did the first life come from that all the other lives evolved from?

Evolution has no answer for this! Not one scientist who has been asked this question has ever been able to answer it.

Darwin avoided dealing with this in "Origen of the Species"
and modern science has never found a way to deal with it.
The remarkable evidence provided by the incredibly complex
dna has baffled many scientists and a good number of them are subscribing to "Intelligent Design."

Consider this - We look at a building, car, watch, computer, telephone, cell phone, calculator, digital camera, and all that man has created in the world and we know through intellect that all these things came about as a product of intelligent design. Every one of these things had a designer. Nobody with the smallest amount of intelligence will deny this.

Considering the simplicity of these findings, it should lead all rational and logical thinking people to believe that at least a strong possibility exists that the complex life systems we know about could have been created as you said above. To shut this concept out completely is bigoted and irresponsible!

It is far more rational and logical to believe that a "Creator" gave His creation the ability to create, than it is to believe we are the product of random chance.

Christians have met the Creator personally - hence we know everything is created (not random chance), and because we know this (not just imagine it) we call it creation.

Answer 3

Ok, How did everything get here sparky?

what the chaos's theory? The theory that thousands of things happened against all odds, The Earth created EVERYTHING.
Also How exactly did it work out so PERFECTLY. It worked out that we needed the plants for oxygen and just so happen to work out that we need this water...

Think about it...Really...

What is it impossible too think we have a creator?

How is the worse then believing the Land created us, and doesn't have a mind....How exactly did this Land do this? And yet it's not producing life forms anymore? What just that once it did it?

Answer 4

i consider you that note Masjid has better repect in its own.. There’s dissimilar debate about the inspiration of the note “mosque.” between the most familiar causes is that in the reign of King Ferdinand and his spouse Queen Isabella -at the same time as they were increasing Christianity hostile to the Muslims-one in each of them supposedly reported that they were going to swat the Muslims contained in the masjid the position they congregate, like mosquitoes. From my study, I unquestionably have discovered that there are 4 conceivable origins for the note ‘mosque’ contained in the English language. the first danger is that it derives from the French note ‘mosquee’ that existed in the course of the era in French linguistic historic previous familiar as ‘midsection French’. the second one danger is that it truly is a spinoff of the Arabic note ‘masjid’. The 0.33 danger is that it derives from the former Italian note ‘moschea’ and the perfect danger is that it comes from the former Spanish note ‘mezquita’. those dissimilar words were used to describe the Muslim position of worship contained in the dissimilar languages reported.. My study discovered no indication that mosque became derived from the note ‘mosquito’. with reference to the visual charm of the time period mosque contained in the English language, scholars propose it became round 1711 ad. this is a lengthy way after King Ferdinand and the Crusades. it would want to be that the time period ‘mezquita,’ used to describe a masjid in previous Spanish, got here from the note ‘mosquito’ and then hence the time period ‘mezquita’ became used to type the time period mosque. although, this does no longer propose that the time period mosque became advanced consequently of the tale..

Answer 5

no matter what name you call it.. we will always know who made it.
no matter what you change in the meaning,
we will always know the one who brought it into being.
and we will always teach it.

you have to understand no one is 100% sure of a belief.
and christians are no better or worse then those of "science".

why? even scientist have faith in a belief that we needed to harvest embrionic stem cells.

turns out they are wrong and we can use adult ones.

you see some times we believe in some thing and we believe its worth a shot to have that belief.
and no matter what you call it, define it, or refer to it as.. people will ALWAYS have the belief.. there is a GOD who made this universe

Answer 6

Have you tried to change the mind of a zealous, fanatic, fundamentalist...I seriously doubt it would mean a thing to them. They are "blinded by the light".

Just Dust

Answer 7

Just leave it be, by trying to limit speech you are being just as fundamental, pretty soon we will no longer be able to say "God bless you" or " O my God" without some lawsuit risk. The world is politically and religiously correct enough leave it before it goes too far.

Answer 8

I don't think that would help. We would continue to refer to it as the Creation.

~Neeva

Answer 9

I bet you're an atheist.

Answer 10

Nope. He made it all bud. Like it or not.