Not quite sure, but I'll tell ya what, I'm sick of hearing about it, is it me or did Al Gore say 20 years ago that we were heading for another ice age? It's hard to believe some of these people when they are trying to push the next generation to do something, Screw you, we aren't the ones who are scientist or the generation who believes that it's too late for THEM to make a difference. I think that this generation should let that generation fix it and try and see what this generation can do to prevent it from happening again. THIS generation shouldn't have to fix the last generations mistakes.
2007-05-22 08:04:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Teheheman 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
By Exposing the Hypocrisy of the "Concerned EnvironMENTALists". As an example, the EPA-OBD II Law mandates that all Gasoline Powered Vehicles in the USA from ' 96 to the Present, must run at 14.7 Parts of Air to 1 Part of Fuel. Any change, even if Emissions are lowered, and Fuel Economy is improved, will result in a failed Vehicle Inspection ! Really ! Under this insane Law, it is entirely possible for a Vehicle to fail Inspection for not emitting enough Pollution ! If the Vehicle's Exhaust Oxygen Sensor does not detect the "Proper" Level of Emissions, a Failure Code will be entered into the Vehicle's Computer, which in turn will send the same Code to the OBD II Vehicle Inspection Machine, that will result in a Failed Inspection ! Gasoline can be safely converted into a Dry, Clear Vapor that is 100 Parts of Air, to 1 Part of Fuel.My Avatar is a Photo of a Device that I have constructed that does just that. I've lit it on Fire to prove it really works. This has the Potential to enable even the largest SUV to get 50 + MPG, and emit 10 times less polluting Exhaust Emissions than with a conventional Fuel System. But again, it's illegal to even attempt on any Vehicle 11 Years Old, or Newer ! Now, 1996, let's see, what Administration was in Power when this "Brilliant" bit of Legislation was enacted ? I'm not the first to figure this out. Far from it ! Go to http://energy21.freeservers.com/bookrep.html and read through all of it. The Liberal Hypocrite environMENTALists refuse to Hear any of this, since they passed the very Legislation that has effectively outlawed Vapor Fuel Technology ! I have tried repeatedly to contact Mr. Al Gore on his site, http://www.climatecrisis.net to ask why it's illegal for any Vehicle 11 Years Old, or newer to emit too little Pollution ! No Reply ! Why ? I guess that would be "An Inconvenient Truth"? The whole Idea behind the Vehicle Inspection System is to have a much greater level of Control over Vehicles, and their Drivers. It's all tied into a Central Database.Leftist Control Freaks that are all in favor of enpowering Big Government love it , especially since they can use Global Warming as an Excuse ! Big Brother Knows Best ?
2007-05-18 16:14:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by gvaporcarb 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you have a very valid point that something like global warming could be used to justify a social takeover, but this could happen with any issue and certainly is happening right now. For example Christianity in the certain parts of America - don't buy this, don't do that, only buy this, pay this etc. It is a system of control, even if you see that the control is to direct you to a more moral lifestyle. But is that not what global warming is about too? Is it not a moral basis with which you must act? What we thought about purchasing and using resources is no longer true, we know now that it is harming the environment to a great deal. It is harming it to the point of possibly destroying this world for the next generation, and maybe even the current generation. Is it not a moral issue to protect something so it can be used by others, and not destroy it? Is it not a moral issue that we cause more good than harm in this world? Global warming solutions are ways to help and foster community amongst the world. You can't argue that they are so much a system of control since so many companies and groups are realizing that this is a problem and are offering solutions to you. You as a person is still not required to do anything about global warming, so you can't argue any form of absolute control. Since more companies are coming w/ solutions you have a choice between them. And thats what it comes down to, a choice if you want to help the environment or not. And unless you are a scientist or have a heavy science background don't begin to think that global warming is a hoax, becuase it isn't. And no global warming doesn't mean that its going to get hotter everywhere, it means the climate is going to change... rapidly.
In the end the safety of your home and of your children is not a partisan issue, it is a human issue. And it isn't currently a control mechanism becuase the government is doing nothing about it, and you have choice to be apart of the solution or apart of the problem. Don't think that because the world is changing, both actually and consciously, that it is a system of control.
2007-05-18 08:45:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Without a doubt and if you need confirmation just read the responses here!
the negative tone of the environazi is evident in both word and composition. Climate change is a natural event that recures (sp) on a cycle. Always has, Always will. It is NOT a "problem" that requires any man made cure. It is not a problem at all. simply put , It is what it is. To quote the great William Murray, " Jane or in this case (Nancy) you ignorant slut". How pompously arogant of you to think that your feeble lifestyle or mine and everyone elses actually influences the weather. Find another car to chase, This hound just wont hunt!
2007-05-21 07:59:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
certain it has grow to be a faith and Al Gore is the pope of the cult.imagine of ways a lot money particular communities will make off of the hype.imagine of all that authorities money going to "study".as well there is purely a lot you may want to do ,in spite of each thing whoever controls the elements controls the international.worry is the perfect political motivator. climate substitute is area of the nature of the planet.hardship-free experience is to have sparkling power yet until eventually there's a dollar in all of it that takes position is communicate,communicate and bigger communicate.authorities guidelines,fines and consequences(gotta get that bailout money someplace) We surely want sparkling air and water .i'm the unique recycler and that i do not waste power a twin of a lot of human beings.i exploit power and do not flow for the "guilt" vacation of doing so. I unquestionably have a situation with Gore the guru who flies round a gas guzzling jet.So does Queen Pelosi who opted for a larger one to fly decrease from side to side to California.keep in mind her protecting she needs to save the planet,yeah she flies we walk.we are able to all start up by technique of utilising the hot power saving gentle bulbs. Oh I forgot they're those with mercury in them.Oh,nicely feels like a sturdy theory on the time. i wager you all heard that some genius flesh presser had to tax cow farmers for any that own better than one hundred for emitting "methane gas" yeah it truly is authentic.can we bottle it instead?Or on second concept deliver some from the bull to that flesh presser as he's well-known with the B.S. at the same time as he sees or smells it.
2016-11-04 09:04:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello, are you THINKING?
If you were, you would realize that the only thing you're paying for, and everybody else for that matter, is the greed of the people who are thoughtlessly creating global warming through the exploitation of any and all natural resources they can get their hands on, whether it's people, land, or oil. It's all for money--and I bet you're not getting any of it! Who's lining their pockets with $3.00/gallon gas prices? Not the "leftists". Who's lining their pockets with military contracts in Iraq? Not the "leftists". And why does the US need control of Iraq in the first place? Hmmm, maybe for the oil?Gee, I wonder who's control we should really be concerned about?
2007-05-21 09:09:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Seca 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are absolutely right. I found the left wing responses sadly funny as well. Some predictably brushed you off as though you were irrelevant, and you are to them if you don't agree with them. Others trot out their tired and worn out arguments citing such credible sources as Greenpeace for God's sake. Remember, there will always be leftists and there will always be another cause.
2007-05-18 18:00:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can anyone in their right mind listen to and believe anything that comes from Al Gore? Think back to the Oliver North trials. Al Gore refused to believe Oliver North about the dangers of Osama Bin Laden. Look where that got us. I don't know what is worse, The stupidty that comes from Al Gore, or the people that actually believe it. Al Gores record is not one to brag about.
2007-05-22 08:33:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Global Warming is not the new rallying cry of "Leftist Control Freaks"! Below you will find supplemental information for your inquiry.
I do not agree with your stance on Global Warming and the "leftists", but I understand how you may have been misinformed, thus causing you to feel this animosity. Therefore, I want to give you my point of view, with hopes of making things clearer for you.
Global warming, pollution, loss of natural spaces, & endangered species are all real problems. You must choose whether or not these problems are worth you time. If you really think about it these problems probably are worth your time because they deal with your existence and your descendents existence directly. Regardless of who is in favor of keeping the earth green, you should support what you believe is worth a fight. But there is no sense in polluting, wasting natural resources, etc. because you think the "Global Warming Campaign" is an evil ploy set to destroy your ideologies. Remember, we share this earth with many living things, and we are all interconnected one way or another.
"Leftists" as well as their counter-parts are sometimes given too much credit. If they were really this deceiving, manipulative, evil force you make them out to be, don't you think they would be in power by now?
Good luck on your journey...and if you will, please heed the words - "Live simply so that others may simply live." Thank you for your time.
2007-05-18 08:59:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Whirled Peas 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yes,the whaco leftists are at it again.Why doesnt hollywood concentrate on making a decent movie instead of driving around in gas guzzlers and lear jets while telling the rest of us to walk.Hypocrytes!!!
2007-05-22 03:10:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kelly C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋