A man was married for 1 and 1/2 years and had a 5 yr old son whom he loved more than life its self. He decided he was unhappy and wanted out. He started hanging outwith a co-worker 6 yrs younger than him (25 & 18 at the time)which later led to love and happiness with a new child. Three weeks after the co-workers started hanging out the man finds out his wife is 2 months pregnant and still decides to leave 2 weeks later to be with new girl. 2nd child is born in, and he does not care for the 2nd child but still loves and is activley involved in older boys life! When the younger child is anywhere in sight he does not pay any attention to him at all. 9 months later he and his new love (the co-worker) welcome beautiful baby girl. He loves oldest boy and daughter but not the second. What do you think
2007-05-18 07:35:16 · 10 answers · asked by Just me 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
he pays CS for both boys and the daughter will never know she has a second brother
2007-05-18 07:46:59 · update #1
he also want to be rid of his second child and terminate all his rights but his ex won't let him
2007-05-18 07:55:37 · update #2
that is really sad. that poor kid is going to need therapy.
2007-05-18 09:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Stacey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously he sees the second child as a barrier because he wanted to start a new life with no new strings attached and that is exactly what didn't happen. He needs to not hold the baby responsible. It's not the baby's fault and does not deserve to be without love from the father. I think he is selfish!!
2007-05-18 07:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by Peppermint 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well that is wrong of course.I can not understand how you can be the Father of 3 children and only love 2 of them.I do Hope the ex is getting child support for all her children,she deserves that.He will someday wake up and find out what a Big mistake he made and regret it but by then it will be to late and His ex will have remarried and the 2nd child will have a Father who cares for him and loves him.Have you ever heard tha song ...The father he din't have to be? Thats a real Father .
2007-05-18 07:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by Dew 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's about the saddest and sickest ingredient i have ever heard of. i will by no potential comprehend for the existence of me how a guy can completely disassociate himself with a baby of his own loins. I propose a baby that got here from interior him. yet that's doubly worse, I propose to be with the older infant and love him and then emotionally abandon the second one infant and then include the 0.33 infant. This sounds like some thing out of a e book. Jesus, how are you going to attempt this?? That boy is going to be scarred for existence. in actuality you're his father, no longer this different guy taking area in daddy. yet possibly it truly is sturdy he has yet another daddy because you're literally unlikely to be there for him. i imagine possibly you're literally not the guy yet some different person telling the tale of the guy, a guy might want to by no potential be this elementary to assert he's performed the form of deplorable ingredient. besides, God, how are you going to/he attempt this? the perfect ingredient is to stroll far flung from both toddlers and performance no longer some thing to do with both boy. I propose imagine of ways which will result them both at the same time as they grow old. "Dad loves me yet no longer you". The little female is possibility-free because she will be in a position to no longer recognize she has a father who's a dick. and what's to happen once you tire of this new female and the child and flow off and be with some different person. at the same time as will it EVER stop! And paying chid help isn't raising a baby. Jesus that's some ill s.hit. you should in simple terms walk far flung from both boys and by no potential see them again. For once do what's perfect for some different person as well your self!
2016-11-04 08:57:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's wrong that he only loves and pays attention two the two children that he wanted and planned it sounds like he didn't want the second child. But that isn't any reason to necglect that child.
2007-05-18 07:46:55 · answer #5 · answered by Lovemykids 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's an a**. The baby is not the cause of the situation. Anyone who would treat a child like that is a moron.
2007-05-18 07:46:14 · answer #6 · answered by Jessica T 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he's very selfish and sick. I can't believe anyone would cast their own child out of their life like that. That's something animals do.
2007-05-18 09:29:42 · answer #7 · answered by Char 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Second child reminds him of guilt of not returning to his wife eventhough she was pregnant with his child.
2007-05-18 07:45:02 · answer #8 · answered by jagratii 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That he is a heartless bas*ard!!
2007-05-18 07:44:52 · answer #9 · answered by adamamandamom 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
he's a d**k.
2007-05-18 07:40:17 · answer #10 · answered by parental unit 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋