they will find something. they love to whine
2007-05-18 06:33:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carlos 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
The thwarting of the will of the American peole by thier elected representatives. The lack of any alternative in either party to redress said betrayal. The tens of millions of additional illegals that will be attracted by the prospect of an additional Amnesty, just as the current batch of 12+ million was attracted by the last Amnesty. The loss of respect that legal immigrants will face now that they're indistinguishable for the illegals they so often opposed. The destruction of our society and our nation. The coming race war.
Is that enough?
2007-05-18 06:27:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
What might the anti people whine about next? Hmm...perhaps Spanish as a mandatory class in school? Welcome to the United States of Mexico...
This is SICKENING. How can anybody be pro to making roughly 12 million ILLEGAL aliens, legal citizens of this country?
I don't understand how we, the American public, (REAL Americans, not the ILLEGALS) can sit and watch this amnesty bill go through. How are we being represented by our elected officials? WE'RE NOT!!! What ever happened to "No taxation without representation", we're paying taxes aren't we? (Not the illegals of course). Do you feel represented? I sure don't.
We're beyond needing a revolt and overthrowing our current government. There is nothing FOR THE PEOPLE about our current administration if they allow this. There are many starving, poor, and uninsured Americans who live in OUR country. Why not take care of them instead of the 12 million (or so) illegals?
THIS IS NOT THE UNITED STATES OF MEXICO!!!!! So climb your illegal rear back over the fence.
2007-05-18 06:27:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by We Done Yet? 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why waste a while on delusion thoughts that no one will ever see? The beneficiaries of unlawful immigration are: a million) the Mexican government and a couple of.) US business enterprise (meaning an identical ingredient as US government). as long because of the fact the governments elect the present gadget, it is going to stay the present gadget –get used to it. Politicians purely use the immigration subject to get votes and then they forget approximately approximately it. A wall should not be equipped, and if equipped it won't artwork. The Mexican-US border has the third maximum legal international commerce interior the international. no longer something would be finished which will intervene with this commerce. for this reason, any wall could incorporate pre-equipped holes. besides, this isn't any longer the fifteenth century and partitions are no longer sensible protection structures. additionally, forget approximately doing something appropriate to the immigrants already right here. There are 20 million unlawful immigrants in united states of america of america. by using assessment there are purely 25 million Iraqis in all of Iraq, and 25% of them stay in one city (Baghdad); and we are in a position to’t even administration the line to the airport – no longer to show the city – no longer to show the 25 million Iraqis. Following Katrina, there have been one hundred,000 human beings, accumulated jointly, who needed us to get them out of recent Orleans. we could desire to no longer retrieve one hundred,000 as quickly as we knew the place they have been and that they had to be got here across. How are we ever going to around up 20,000,000 that are unfold out for the era of united states of america of america, and who do no longer elect to be got here across? we are no longer – because of the fact we can't. There quite are judgements we could desire to make, yet partitions and deportation are purely a stupid waste of time, power, and money.
2017-01-10 06:48:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mexicans are already whining that giving amnesty to the 12-20 million illegals already here excludes future illegals. They want an open door to come and go as they please. Arrogant POS.
2007-05-18 06:34:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Uh, the same thing, granting amnesty will only fuel the "illegal" fire, more will come and ask for it as well.
Cheers and have a nice day.
2007-05-18 06:31:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is only amnesty if there is no penalty for the crime. Since there is a $5000 fine along with other requirements then it is not Amnesty.
2007-05-18 06:26:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shay 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Everyne I know is putting pressure on their representatives to vote against this.
It isn't over until the fat lady sings, and I don't think Rosie O'Dipstick sings.
2007-05-18 06:43:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by chuck_junior 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
First of all, you're making assumptions about its passage.
But, as far as whining, I did see a post on here already today that someone complained that a Z visa would be discrimination against the "formally illegal", that it wasn't "fair"....
2007-05-18 06:26:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by steddy voter 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
They will not be the ones whining. It will be the new citizens whining because their jobs are being replaced by illegal immigrants fresh into the country.
2007-05-18 06:25:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lisaa 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Keep in mind, its not a done deal yet. Lets hope they don't have the votes.
2007-05-18 06:27:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋