I don't know, that girl's got some junk. Thirty minutes is OK for rare, but if you want medium well I'd go with twice that time.
2007-05-18 06:03:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Veruca Salt 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Some meals are healthy and some aren't. You have too look are the individual meals. I do know that Rachael Ray also have a version of her 30 minute meals that has lighter meals that is for the healthier minded person.
2016-04-01 08:07:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A bit fatty if you've seen her after her marriage. But I don't have the time to carve her up and cook her in 30 minutes. The flank might be OK.
2007-05-18 05:56:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by chefgrille 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No! After she gave the viewers high blood pressure and heart attacks .... she would still be "raw"!
She would taste like something sammied together in thirty minutes or less! Whatever happened to real food?
2007-05-18 05:58:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No she wouldn't, unless all the people behind the scenes actually do the prep work and the pre-cooking for a 30 minute meal.
I guess She'd be a little dry and stringy since she's past her prime.
2007-05-18 05:52:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dave C 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
She'd probably taste just like the s**t she puts on her plates.
2007-05-18 05:59:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by skittles 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Italian Chicken lol and pasta
2007-05-18 05:57:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by cc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I think she is very hot so I would have to say that it would involve something premature, hey just being honest!
2007-05-18 06:25:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess it would depend in part on how you prepare her and what seasoning you use. BAM! There goes another chef in the pot.
2007-05-18 05:47:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Acorn S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
She would taste like garlic and beer and "E.V. O.O." !!! Lol...... It seems like she uses those in every dish.
2007-05-18 05:45:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by gg 7
·
2⤊
0⤋