"Every creation has a creator, the universe was created therefor has a creator"?

Question

hows is that stand point valid, let alone proof of god? i dont know why people think this way, since when does there have to be a creator? (kirk cameron cough cough)

and dont you dare say "well it didnt just create itself", who said it had to have been created in the 1st place?

Answer 1

It is the idea behind the concept that anything as complex as the universe and our planet in particular and we as human beings specifically... is evidence in and of itself that their is intelligence and purpose behind the processes... design or creation

hence a necessity for a creator... however the scale of basic sources for material and techniques or methods necessary or developed to put together what we perceive as reality is truly not comprehendable by man...

i mean the human brain alone cannot be challenged by any creation of man... not to mention the design of the human body and the interaction of all its systems... the complexity of this in conjunction with the rest of the known and unknown universe beg the question of this being simple by chance over time.... time which by the way is a system of measure in the design and therefore the most understood portion...

us trying to understand the creator would be like watching Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck talking to their artists giving the direction on what to do in a scene... it is funny watching the creature attempt to chastise its creator

imagine if you drew a picture on a sheet of paper and the trip you would be experiencing if the picture had the ability to affect your life in anyway...

God is so much more than a human can even begin to think about imagining... that is why those with to much analtyical thinking have a problem with religion... however if they would quit looking for the proof with a limited number of variables and open their minds they may realize there are influences they never considered

Answer 2

This is a circular argument. Also, for this argument to be valid, one must accept the first premise: "Every creation has a creator...." What does one mean by the term "creation"? The universe could be the product of, as Carl Sagan would say, A billion years of a natural process. Of course, deists such as Jefferson believed that this creator was a cosmic clock maker who created the universe and then had little or no influence over it. Jefferson was not a Christian in the traditional sense of the word. In fact, he made his own Bible by cutting out the parts about miracles and keeping useful parables and precepts.

Answer 3

No one knows why the universe came into being. In fact, it is not entirely clear that we can coherently speak about the "beginning" or "creation" of the universe at all, as these ideas invoke the concept of time, and here we are talking about the origin of space-time itself.

The notion that atheists believe that everything was created by chance is also regularly thrown up as a criticism of Darwinian evolution. As Richard Dawkins explains in his marvelous book, "The God Delusion," this represents an utter misunderstanding of evolutionary theory. Although we don't know precisely how the Earth's early chemistry begat biology, we know that the diversity and complexity we see in the living world is not a product of mere chance. Evolution is a combination of chance mutation and natural selection. Darwin arrived at the phrase "natural selection" by analogy to the "artificial selection" performed by breeders of livestock. In both cases, selection exerts a highly non-random effect on the development of any species.

Answer 4

The universe appears so very fine-tuned for life that it seems it must have been designed. Scientists think that the Big Bang was a one time event so there appears to have been only one try and life arose on that one try. While that is not proof of a Creator, it does legitimately give rise to hope that there is a Creator.

If God is a plausible explanation, then we are justified in seeking Him.

Answer 5

I agree. And at best, that argument still leaves open the possibility of ANY god or gods doing the creating. I don't understand how people make the leap from "the universe was created" to "the God of the Bible did the creating".

Answer 6

loss of evidence? like loss of evidence of evolution you recommend? do not think of your lack of knowledge is any form of evidence. enjoying dumb would come organic to you however the subject is with you not others. in case you think of the finite universe would not want an limitless reason them tutor it. thus far scientists have basically been able to tutor that the universe won't be able to have created itself. Neutrinos pass speedier than mild so even technological information and causality itself would nicely be incorrect. you're able to probable study the great bang and understand what that assertion ability. you're able to examine stellar nurseries too and understand what it ability if there is not any higgs boson. The writer would not want a writer as he's limitless. infinity won't be able to be created it could basically ever exist. it is not my fault you failed at stepped forward arithmetic and would basically parrot off what you study from others critiques. God being limitless won't be able to have a writer else he's not God. you in basic terms are not getting it so supply up humiliating your self you pretentious armchair academic.

Answer 7

Its called a singularity. An event that takes place that breaks down all of science, mathmatics, and cosmology. Stephen Hawkin has been trying to come up (outside of science) with what is called a self-contained universe. He wants so bad to beleive that there was no creation event, that he postulates that the universe was never created but always existed. Unfortunately no science or mathmatics nor cosmology, or astrological understandings can support this....Hmmm so what we have is the top scientists of the word saying have faith in what I am saying, and saying that faith is not science (to christians)....kinda the pot calling the kettle black eh?

Oh and if you go to your local barnes and noble book store and pick up books on cosmology, you will find that a plurality of cosmologists take it back to a creation event.

Answer 8

This type of circular logic is what morons like cameron live for. He does not have the brains to understand why this is so meaningless. You and I certainly do. After all, the word creation has nothing necessarily to do with the universe, does it?

Answer 9

I know, what if the universe has always been here and never was created. So a creator is not possible since it never began.

Answer 10

The definition of "creation" indicates there has to be a Creator. :o)

Anyone who looks at the intricacies of this universe and how incredible it is for all of it to have come together just as it did would have to acknowledge an intelligence behind it...i.e., a Creator. Everyone knows it, but there are lots who want to deny it because of what it would mean in their own lives to put themselves under an actual higher power.