Have the Democrate s come up with a realistic plan for Iraq Yet?

Question

All I have seen was lets run and hide. I did hear recently they have a plan to continue training the Iraq army and police.. But if the Iraq forces don't have our in the field backing, from what I have seen they will be slow to act and many will die as a result.

Answer 1

Yes their plan is continue to make the republics look bad.

Then win presidency

Then take troops out and wait for WW3

They care more about obtaining a political office then telling the truth.

They care even less about the lives of the poeple of Iraq and the future security of the USA.

Answer 2

The fact is there is no plan, sometimes civil wars HAVE to happen because groups of people just cannot live together. Right now our troops are just cannon fodder for the civil war and in some cases making it worse by mistreating prisoners and conducting random raids on family homes. Not only does this encourage insurgents/ Al-Qaeda to attack U.S forces, but the fact that this violence is happening because of the U.S precense further angers the Iraqis and perpetuates the civil war. If one would pay attention, Democrats have proposed a slow troop withdrawl, slowly replacing combat troops with military advisors to the Iraqi army, this is supplemented by slowly lowering the budget as advisors are much cheaper than batallions, tanks, etc. Im not sure how much this will do to stop the civil war, but it is a plan and not just the status-quo that obviously hasnt worked. I really think that a civil war is inevitable because people in the middle east do not take the current Iraq government seriously because it is competley proped up by the U.S and U.K. This has left a virtual power vacuum, something that history will show is almost always solved by civil war. The idea is to not get westerners involved in an eastern problem, we dont need to be the world police.

Answer 3

Getting out of an expensive occupation the country's supposed leaders don't know how to otherwise resolve, that demonstrably isn't providing any of the defensive benefit they claim for it, for which the occupied people themselves have no enthusiasm, is always a good plan.

If it became absolutely necessary, another quick run through the capitol, to depose whatever party was in power there, followed again by an immediate withdrawl, could always be arranged, at far less cost.

Of course, it would be helpful if our supposed leadership could show they have the slightest ability to competently determine what is actually necessary.

The problem with America's military policy isn't that the armed forces are too reluctantly or slowly thrown into war.

The problem is, they are thrown into unnecessary war, over BS.

And our supposed leadership can't summon up the basic testicular integrity to admit they screwed up, and correct their mistake.

Answer 4

I find it funny that Bush had a chance at 4 billion more for his spending plan with the set bench marks placed by the Dem's and the Cons. But Mr. Macho vetoed them.

Now he agrees with the bench marks, and they have given him less funding set in increments based on the bench marks. Meaning with every bench mark met by the Iraqi government - Bush will get more funding for the troops.
Now that's a plan.

If Dumb Dumb Bush would have excepted the first proposal - he'd had all his funding and then some for the troops. So who's looking stupid now?!

Answer 5

there is not any plan! it may be a huge mistake to drag all the troops at as quickly as besides. that ought to o.k. carry the assaults back to our soil. i like the be conscious "Dummycrats". very stable!! help our troops. lots of them are actually not there by way of determination, and that they are doing a thankless interest. a minimum of by way of lots of their fellow countrymen, that's a rattling shame.

Answer 6

Ummm, we're still trying to get Bush to come up with a realistic plan for Iraq. It's his war and he still doesn't have a plan except to throw more troops and more money at it with the same old failed policies..

Answer 7

How many terrorists were killed by U.S. forces today? none. Yesterday? none, etc etc etc etc etc
How many GIs does it take to kill one terrorist? More than 150,000, apparently. Since we're failing to find and kill the enemy, and since our presence there is a recruitment bonanza for Al Qaeda and the insurgents, the best plan is the exit plan.

Answer 8

no one has a plan for Iraq and whatever happened to Afghanistan you never hear about that.

Answer 9

Iltrix hit it right on the dot, and Steven wonders about Afghanistan ...wasn't that where whose name was hiding?

Answer 10

hah-ha-ha-ha-ha! ROFLMAO!!!

The words "Democrats" and "plan" in the same sentence together! LOL!!

Thanks, you just made my day!