2007-05-10 18:32:42 · 10 answers · asked by MMMM 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Amen, Brother!
Sounds something like the Denis Leary Doctrine...
"Shiny happy people holding...hey hey hey hey hey - pull that bus over to the side of the Pretentiousness Turnpike, alright. I want everybody off the bus, I want the Shiny People over here, and the Happy People over there. I represent the angry, gun-toting meat-eating f*ckin' people, alright!"
But beware, O my Brother, for the nature of the people is perverse, and will react against anything laid down upon them as a commandment. The thrill of sin will invest them with a stronger and stronger urge to break free from the demands of doctrine, resulting, ultimately in more preppy, peppy, councy people, rather than fewer.It is the nature of humans and doctrine that if we wish to reduce the number of perky little toerags bouncing around the place, our law should state "Thou Shalt Be Perky Every Moment" - then they will rebel against this order, and we will have done the world a genuine favour.
2007-05-10 20:21:43 · answer #1 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ever since the dawn of mankind, around 40,000 years ago, when God revealed the possiblity of his existence to mankind by giving humans a powerful imagination, people have wondered about their origins. Where did we come from? Who created us? Over the centuries, to answer these very basic questions, our storytellers have invented many myths, stories and dogmas. Religions are simply the outgrowth of these ancient myths and dogmas handed down from generation to generation and formalized into faiths, rituals and traditions.
Religions are simply rules for living our lives morally. Rules made so that we are able to get along with each other - under the threat of eternal damnation or eternal happiness in heaven. Mankind creates political and religious rules - God creates the physical laws. We can choose, whether or not, we wish to obey mankind's rules - but we must obey God's laws (nature's laws) - we have no choice in that area.
2007-05-11 01:57:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
THat would not be a commandment, perhaps a doctrine.. if you want it to be a commandment start it out with "thou shalt not be perky"
2007-05-11 01:49:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. Vanna White has made a good living off of perkiness, and I have no reason to wish her ill. But beware the FSM -- He is a jealous God, and does not brook competition lightly.
2007-05-11 01:36:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Perky can be good for somethings. But personality wise, yeah, perky can be a pain but then so can crabby.
2007-05-11 01:35:55 · answer #5 · answered by LA Law 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would word it a little differently.
How about..."Thou Shalt Not Be Perky"
2007-05-11 01:44:03 · answer #6 · answered by shadelandfarm 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The first words that the god of this new religion were thus, "Shiny happy people holding hands... piss me off."
2007-05-11 01:46:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
That isn't a commandment so much as it is a doctrine.
2007-05-11 01:35:41 · answer #8 · answered by WWTSD? 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
as long as you leave perky breasts be.
2007-05-11 01:42:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Can you include morning people in there, too? ;)
2007-05-11 01:49:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋