2007-05-10 13:09:37 · 8 answers · asked by kappalokka 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
when I saw that headline I just started to laugh.
Soon you will see some Evangelical group start advocating for his release.
2007-05-10 13:13:34 · answer #1 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Even though his eternal soul may be preserved, he still has to pay the penalty for sin committed here.
There are consequences for sin in this life and the one to come. Unless a person repents of their sins before they die, they are destined to eternal separation from God. But there are repercussions for sin in this lifetime, even after someone has repented.
2007-05-10 20:21:32 · answer #2 · answered by redeemed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. People should pay the legal penalty for their wrongs.
Im glad his soul is set free from sins though
2007-05-10 20:30:01 · answer #3 · answered by Eartha Q 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He and Kirk Cameron would be a perfect tag-team for more debates where they don't need the bible to prove that God exists.
2007-05-10 20:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by S K 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. There is a difference between forgiveness and consequence. He may well be forgiven. But there are still consequences for his actions.
2007-05-10 20:15:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, if He has made peace with God then it is between him and God. He still has to "pay' for the crimes he commited here in society.
2007-05-10 20:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by Beverly B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He can move next door to you.
I hope you don't have any barking dogs.
2007-05-10 20:21:48 · answer #7 · answered by elliebear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, chances are he will kill a christian.
2007-05-10 20:12:40 · answer #8 · answered by KEVIN D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋