If evolution is true than why don't apes give birth to human beings?

Question

I haven't heard of one ape ever giving birth to men.

you see, atheists, your evolution is wrong.

humans never came from apes.

Jesus told me that you would accept him if you read my question.

glory to God.

Answer 1

Oh dear.

Answer 2

Okay, first off thats not how evolution happened or is happening so get educated at your local high school

Secondly, you can't disprove evolutionism with one statement that apes don't give birth to humans. Evolution is a process taking millions upon millions of years. When the genes in apes mutated slightly, there was a chance that their offspring would carry on that difference in appearance or traits. Through the years, these differences piled onto each other, creating different species' of apes like chimps, orangutans and baboons. But the greatest change in appearance and traits would be Homo sapians or humans.

Of course, evolution was not instant. Apes didn't suddenly give birth to humans, and atheist know this. Now, being an agnostic or one who doesn't beleive in god but still doesn't denounce his presence, or in lamens terms doesn't care, I could care less if you beleive in god and creation. But don't try and go out of your way to prove an entire beleif system wrong with one statement because thats all your religion is, a beleif.

Answer 3

The reason why is because Evolution is a process that takes eons to be obvious.
You see, evolution is caused by replication mistakes of the genetic code during mitosis and during the combination of gamete cells. If the random genetic mutations are in fact desirable ones, the specimen carrying them will live on to pass it's genes on to the next generation, thus slowly altering a species.
So you see, your expectation of an Ape suddenly giving birth to a Human is kind of like expecting a Jaguar to give birth to a domestic house-cat: Even though they are both common ancestors, there are too many genetic differences for a cross over of species to suddenly take place. Besides, a species is defined when it can no longer breed with it's common ancestor.
And I'm sorry, but I still don't believe in Jesus, but I'm just hoping you bothered to read this long answer!

Answer 4

lol, here's a free clue, buddy. If an ape ever DID give birth to human, that would do more to REFUTE the Theory of Evolution than anything any creationist has ever come up with.

Evolution is not a ladder with humans at the top--that's just another dopey creationist straw man argument. Evolution doesn't claim humans came from apes--both humans AND apes came from a common ancestor many millions of years ago. Just because YOU don't understand it doesn't mean it makes sense to no one--some education (notice I said "education" not "indoctrination"--you'd have to go outside your church to learn about this) would set you straight.

Also, evolution is not atheistic.

Answer 5

well you see, i never saw a wood duck give birth to a black duck either. but you can watch genealogically how each generation of wood duck differed slightly, until we have the modern black duck. they didn't overnight give birth to a black duck (and this is indisputable, there are no missing links in the wood duck black duck link every single generation is documented). so over thousands of year they "evolved" (hence the term evolution) we didn't just suddenly mutate and pop out upright. but evolution is continuing, that's why 7% of humans are born with tails, 14% are born minus 2 ribs, 77% have appendix that do nothing, we are taller and have less defined facial features then we did just 5000 years ago. also some people are starting to be born WITHOUT some organs that are useless such as the appendix, and adenoids (further evolution) also hermaphodillia is becoming more prevalent.(another evolutionary path)

Answer 6

I'm Christian, but your statement seems just plain silly..

Evolution, from my understanding, is based on a process of evolving over hundreds/thousands of years.. evolving to adapt to the needs of a certain area for example, things like that..

Evolution is NOT the idea that a Giraffe gives birth to a fish or an ape gives birth to a human or a human gives birth to a tree.

While I personally do not subscribe to the idea that we all began from some one-celled being and so on.. I do obviously see that there is some forms of evolution (like adapting to an area over the years/generations, etc)..

BUT.. my point is.. either you're mocking Evolutionists or you are sadly misinformed on the idea, because it isn't that apes of today are suddenly going to give birth to humans.

Answer 7

You're talking about a process that took millions if not billions of years. Lastly, it's not only atheists that believe in evolution. I believe in God and believe he created the universe. However, realize that a lot of things in the bible are figuritive, things like the number 7, 12, and 40 are heavily repeated throughout the bible. Why? They are religiously signifcant numbers, 12 tribes of Israel etc. The bible isn't supposed to be taken literally but instead is mostly a collection of stories that are meant to teach a moral. Regardless, I can see how you think the science of evolution is not quite complete, because it isn't, yet I find it even more interesting that you believe that world was created in 7 days, a wave of his hand and there's man. Let's see, we have some proof of evolution, and absolutely no proof that the world was created in 7 days. In addition if god created man prior to the animals, how do you explain the fact that dinosaurs, etc were around prior to even the beginning of man?

Answer 8

Apes don't give birth to humans. Apes and humans had a common ancestor. Big difference. Besides, why couldn't evolution be God's way of creating life? It says nothing specific in Genesis about HOW God created life, it just says that he did it.

Answer 9

Because that's NOT HOW IT WORKS. Evolution works slowly over TIME, not all at once. Even you should know that. Don't you ever pay attention in school. o.O Have you ever seen a person with webbed fingers or toes? Now, if we lived in a watery environment, that person would be able to swim better, and have a better chance of surviving to produce offspring. Those offspring would also have webbed fingers and toes. And they, in turn, would have children with the same trait. This would continue with the mutations that gain them the advantage being the traits that are passed on.

Don't ask a quesiton like that if you don't know what you're talking about. Goodness gracious. o.O

Answer 10

"Ape" and "Monkey" are phrases we invented to assist describe what we see, and the only extremely significant description of the placement is the phylogenetic tree. That pronounced, all apes proportion specific features, and so all have the designation "ape". As human beings, we very firmly fall into this class. We extremely proportion extra features (and DNA) with chimpanzees than chimpanzees do with Orang Utans, and that's extremely difficult to dispute the very incontrovertible fact that chimpanzees and orang utans belong in the comparable group. by ability of this definition (and by ability of very very nearly another) human beings very defninitely *are* apes. Monkeys are a diverse difficulty. all of them proportion comparable features, yet have important differences from the apes. this implies that they do belong in a separate group (apes are actually not monkeys and monkeys are actually not apes) however the similarities placed the two communities (monkeys and apes) right into a single larger group (primates). of direction, as quickly as returned the names are made up, and definitely many arguments rage as to the place the strains are drawn. that's thrilling to word, as an occasion, that that's totally very nearly impossible to entice a company line between birds and dinosaurs, and as a result the gang "reptiles" technically could contain birds. that's not, besides the undeniable fact that, an exceedingly useful definition for us to apply, so we tend to differentiate between birds and their direct ancestors.

Answer 11

Wow your train of logic is confusing.

That's like saying evolution isn't real because Alligators don't give birth to crocodiles. They are very similar but followed a different evolutionary path.

And evolution takes hundreds and thousands of years. It doesn't happen over the course of one generation. Not as dramatic a change as what you are saying.