That on that debate last night with Kirk and Ray against those agnostics, that Ray and Kirk were far more strong in what they said? That they sounded FAR more sensible? I am a christian of course, but I applaud them for what they did and what they said-- They defended God's word, and they will be truly BLESSED!
2007-05-10 09:25:09 · 7 answers · asked by Mandolyn Monkey Munch 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well the half that I saw, what they said was truth, and that is what matters- it made MORE sense than what agnostics believe- that is what my point is, God makes sense! AND THEY DID prove His existence you just choose not to see it. Look outside!
2007-05-10 12:16:45 · update #1
I didn't see it.
Strong christians are needed.
2007-05-10 11:39:45 · answer #1 · answered by robert p 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There was nothing "sensible" about anything they said. Everything they said was based on beliefs, and not facts or evidence, like they claimed. The "crockoduck" thing was so bad that even I was embarrassed for them. All they proved with THAT little bit was that they obviously couldn't even take the 5 minutes of research into the theory of evolution that it would have took to KNOW that that argument was ridiculous and would make them look like idiots.
Look, I admire their determination to believe what they believe in. I don't wish them ill, but there was NOTHING resembling a strong argument on their side. They presented exactly the same arguments that atheists have been quashing for generations, now. They made the claim that they could 100% scientifically PROVE the existence of God without using faith or the Bible. Two minutes into their argument, they were quoting the Bible, and talking about what they "believed".
2007-05-10 17:18:07 · answer #2 · answered by Jess H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm an agnostic and because I get up at 2 am I am never up to see night line but to be honest after seeing Kirk with that banana I will never again take anything he says seriously. Perhaps he should go back to growing pains.
2007-05-10 16:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by genaddt 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I saw it differently, but the crocoduck was ludicrous. I think a real debate, with a Christian theologian and an atheistic scientist would be much more interesting, less of a farce.
2007-05-10 16:29:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Kurt Cameron said he would show "the existence of god can be proven, one hundred percent, absolutely, without the use of faith."
He didn't.
2007-05-10 16:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by YY4Me 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You wouldn't be a tad bit biased would you?
2007-05-10 16:28:45 · answer #6 · answered by glitterkittyy 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Oh, you would. You would. I've seen your posts.
2007-05-10 16:31:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋