2007-05-10 09:01:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The next step in duck evolution.
...according to creationists of course.
2007-05-10 09:03:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see where there is an issue with the logic they displayed regarding transitional forms. Yes the picture of a crocduck was absurd, that's the point. We have never seen anything like that. Brian "Sapients" argument owned himself. He claimed that millions of little steps "micro-evolution" would eventually lead to one big step "macro-evolution. So where is this transitional species? If as the theory suggest that a dinosaur evolved into a bird or an ape like creature into a human then where is that intermediary step of a species that was both reptile and bird or ape and human? I would think that even along the way of those "millions of tiny steps" there would be visible proof of the change that is occurring, correct? The change doesn't occur invisibly. According to people who believe in evolution and how one species changes into a completely new species, then there should be a fossil record that shows this, a historical "time lapse" camera that subtly shows changes over time from one species to another and at some point that species should contain both what it was and what it is to become at some point later in time? Do these animals die and not leave some type of record of their existence? Only the full species at each end of the spectrum lives, dies and then leaves a record of its existence?
May not be the most sound argument but the idea and principle is there and any one who claims to have a brain backed by logic and reason may not agree with it because their own "beliefs" conflict with it, but if they are as intelligent as they say they are then they can see the logic and principles behind it. Instead what they have done is mock it and belittle it calling it absurd (which btw was the intent so thanks for proving that). Way to stick to your faith and not waiver in your beliefs. Would that make you narrow minded? Sounds a lot like what you accuse Christians of sticking to their silly beliefs and remain narrow minded. Interesting.
2007-05-10 16:39:46 · answer #2 · answered by Bruce Leroy - The Last Dragon 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's an intermediate species that Kirk Cameron thinks has to exist for evolution to be correct.
Ha!
2007-05-10 16:05:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's Kirk Cameron's latest "refutation" to evolution. Every combination of creature has to exist for evolution to be true.
2007-05-10 16:07:03 · answer #4 · answered by novangelis 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Kirk Cameron's pet.
2007-05-10 16:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by S K 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Does this mean that Kirk Cameron (and his groupies) have been mating with animals themselves, so to test their silly premise?
2007-05-10 16:14:47 · answer #6 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A cross between a crocodile and duck, known for it's ability to breath fire
2007-05-10 16:03:29 · answer #7 · answered by Cannibal Ox 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
a crocidile that eat a duck who whole and no it sounds f++ked u haha
2007-05-10 16:05:16 · answer #8 · answered by mart the man 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
would make an interesting shoe, i found a picture of one!! lmao
2007-05-10 16:04:59 · answer #9 · answered by misskittys357 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thank you for asking....I was wondering myself. Sure would like to see one
2007-05-10 16:04:43 · answer #10 · answered by tecvba 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋