English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What did America ever do to them?

2007-05-10 08:44:51 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

18 answers

1) It is a way to attack President Bush, who they detest.
2) Terrorists seem romantic to them.

2007-05-10 09:15:57 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 13 1

Liberals are accused of being pro-terrorism because they are criticizing the anti-terrorism policies of the Republicans.

2007-05-10 16:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 1

America gave them freedom. Liberals don't like freedom. They want their country to own them, and give to them. Liberalism is another name for Socialism, which is against every fiber of an Americans history, meaning, and beginning. I think Liberals either lost the knowledge they got from our history books about our forefathers, and why they fought England for a country of their own, never learned it, or never cared about it.
As to the why they are pro-terrorism, I can't answer that, since I am not a Liberal, and can't possibly understand them.

2007-05-10 10:08:58 · answer #3 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4 2

Liberals hang with the Hollywood crowd at least in thought, as they are much like sheep being led to slaughter. Keep in mind that they are very much into the ACLU which in my estimation is a communist organization. One of the most popular Liberal of all is a person that simply got away with murder with Mary Joe Koepecne, his name is Ted Kennedy. Now, by the way he is all for gun control.
I can go on and on but let's just say that they are a bunch of weak people that go out of their way to give people the benefit of the doubt. Hey, here is a prediction for you... The six Ft Dix terrorist in time will get off scott free.

2007-05-10 09:02:02 · answer #4 · answered by TanTom 3 · 3 2

ok lets set this straight... we are not pro terrorism, we are humanitarians. we think that there are better solutions than killing first and asking questions later. we are not anti-patriotic, we just believe in a peaceful solution to problems. when Churchill said " speak softly and carry a big stick" he intended for us to SPEAK first, and only use the stick if we need to. not the other way around. so give us a break, we simply have different solutions to problems.

stop listening to Rush Limbaugh, he is a pill popping hypocrite.

2007-05-10 10:42:41 · answer #5 · answered by sage w 2 · 2 2

Liberals in this country and terrorists have the same agenda: Tear down the U.S., if a Republican is in charge. If the Democrats are in charge, then it's cowtow to the terrorists and apologize for the existance of the U.S.

2007-05-10 08:54:32 · answer #6 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 2 2

It is just a Liberal call for help. They are saying "Help me, someone, please! Our theories are sh*t, so what else can we do to maintain our ratings with the public?"

John Kerry did the same thing when he contacted the KGB for help in getting President Regan out of office during the mid 80’s.

This is Attention Getting or acting out. Acting out is defined as the release of out-of-control aggressive or sexual impulses in order to gain relief from tension or anxiety. Such impulses often result in antisocial or delinquent behaviors.

The earliest acting out behaviors are often referred to as temper tantrums. These behaviors are usually first observed in infants between the ages of 12 and 18 months of age. But this behavior can extend into later stages of life and is due primarily to lack of discipline on part of parents, liberalism, and an education system gone awry. Look at Cho for example.

Temper tantrums can be considered a normal part of growth and development. These tantrums are simply an attempt to communicate feelings of dissatisfaction or extreme disappointment. Observed behaviors in liberals trying to express their anger or frustration usually include patently angry-sounding crying, kicking hands and feet, blindly supporting terrorism and possibly even trying to strike out using the KGB as support. For Feminists, such violent outbursts of temper often include hitting, kicking, and biting others; and possibly self-injurious behaviors such as head-banging and suicide. The lib's reaction to the supposed cause of the tantrum is often markedly disproportionate to the precipitating incident. An example would be the liberal who is told that he or she cannot inject methamphetamine and then proceeds to violently attack the mother, hitting and kicking her, while screaming as loudly as possible.

Acting out conduct can include any highly emotional, disruptive, and unacceptable outburst that appears to be the liberal's reaction to unmet needs or wishes. A primary reason for such emotional lack of control in a liberal, especially above the age of three or four, is having not learned how to cope with their own frustration. Such temper tantrums peak between the ages of two and three but usually extend into late adulthood if left unchecked. This is due to bad parenting. Because under normal circumstances, with normal parents, the liberal child has learned the necessary lessons in how to deal with disappointment by the time he or she has reached the age of four, there is then a noticeable decrease in this sort of acting out behavior.

In the case of early adulthood acting out, the only known cure is called the b*tch slap. It involves physical contact to the point of severe beatings.

Other theorists advocate that Liberals should be forced to find real work. This includes various therapies from weaning the anti-social adult away form spoiling parents, drug rehab, all the way to prison sentences and forced labor.

2007-05-10 11:58:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

They ALWAYS blame America first. It's some sort of weird guilt complex. By the way, you have a really cute smile. Are you taken?

2007-05-10 09:24:55 · answer #8 · answered by Big D 4 · 3 2

Why are you so pro a one party totalitarian state?

2007-05-11 00:47:51 · answer #9 · answered by Morgy 4 · 0 1

If you are a troll, go back under your bridge.
If you're serious, you are exhibiting childishness and a total lack of understanding - at best.
The worst interpretation would put you on a par with the worst fascist propagandists ever. They also appealed at the basest instincts in their audience.

2007-05-10 10:05:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers