In the beginning everything was made and God called everything good.
Certain diseases were non existent then. So also certain worms or blood suckers, etc. weren't there. Some things are created after the fall of Adam & are a curse. For example weeds grow in our gardens. We have to pull the weeds out.
To God, a day is like a 1000 yrs and 1000yr like a day. That would be one Ion or an age (1000 yrs).
2007-05-10 08:35:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by t_a_m_i_l 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
First of all, sharp teeth do not prove that an animal is a carnivore, or even an omnivore, for that matter. Look at gorillas, fruit bats, iguanas, etc. Also, there was a recorded instance of a lion who was raised in captivity in a zoo who refused to eat meat its entire life. It was a vegetarian lion. It's digestive system was obviously just fine for digesting vegetation. In fact, you may hear even today that an all-vegetable diet for your dog is the optimum diet that will allow your dog to live 20-30 years. Your dog will avoid so many of the diseases that plague other dogs who are fed the usual meat/grain diet. It's teeth have nothing to do with it.
There is even evidence that T-Rex may not have been a carnivore at all, but a melon-eater. His teeth are similar to those of an iguana, which is a fruit-and vegetable-eater. He's really not built for speed or stealth, and all the biggest animals this planet has ever seen have all been herbivores (or krill-eaters at the most). Why should T-Rex be any different?
And how do you know that God didn't provide some animals with a means of extracting nutrition from the world around it after the Fall?
Also, I do believe that plants were created on Day 3, even though the Sun wasn't created until Day 4, for two reasons:
1) The plants would havehad enough energy to survive for one day without sun, and 2) God Himself is light, and He would have provided any needed light for them anyway. If one believes in the Day/Age theory, those poor plants would have had to wait for millions of years for the sun to come up!
2007-05-10 08:46:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by FUNdie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
im kind of a bible literalist... kind of... not really.. or not sure.... heh..
1) right so first off, yes evolutionarily speaking, the Lions have specialized incisors for carnivorous activity. But this is not to say that what a Lion to us was not a lion back then. uhhh tapeworms could have got it off earth and mosquitoes could have got it off other animals? sharks on other animals..... thats if any of these animals existed back then. The point i am trying to get across is that they could have evolved ( uh oh im stepping on a slippery slope) or that the animals we see today were simply no existant back then and could have been a more unofrm species. The second part of your arguement falls under this, that when you create something such as a lion for eating other animals, why not give them a complete diegestive tract and a good pair of incisors with it?
2) I think you mean eons....
oh and uh maybe you havnt read this..
Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
yup there was already light...
2007-05-10 08:40:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Panda WafflesZilla 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the answer is quite simple and profound, ive thought of this myself. the conclusion of the matter would be in order of the questions
1) animals pre-flood would have eaten only vegitation and this states that evolution cannot be but adaptation is a real thing that all christians and scientists can agree on or at least cant ignore. but that is not to say that one species evolved from one to another. there is no reason to believe that some of these species even existed in the beginning either. the bible does talk about amalgamations not explicitely but it does allude to them. this would explain some of the new species coming out.
2) and to believe that the days referred to in genesis were years is a bit of a stretch but understandable how you may have came to that conclusion. the bible says that God created light even before the sun so the light required for the plants would have already been there.
also an added question. if the sun and moon were created later how could there have been an evening and morning of the first day if they were created the fourth day. the answer is simple evening and morning are simply increments of time the sun and moon were given for signs of time. to put it simply God created time first (which would explain him being outside of time and not held to the laws of it as we are) and then he created the clock to measure it.
2007-05-10 08:45:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by kenshiro 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
interior the Genesis account, God says that they could consume from any tree interior the backyard, and each seed-bearing plant. there isn't something mentioned approximately ingesting meat or killing animals. that did not ensue until after the autumn. God additionally mentioned that each and all of the animals have been to consume the fairway flowers. They curiously weren't carnivores the two at that element. Scripture says that God will re-create the organic order because it became meant to be back. because it says, the lion shall consume straw like an ox, and the lion shall lie down with the lamb. guy became not anticipated to be merciless to God's creation, yet to take care of it and tend the backyard. besides the undeniable fact that, as you study extra relating to the religion, you recognize that Christ got here to repair guy's dominion and authority that became lost on the autumn. the particularly some new testomony scriptures generically consult with this authority as 'power'. Tony Evans has an extremely solid sequence on non secular authority that covers the empowerment we receive in Christ.
2017-01-09 14:46:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.Read the text again please; sharks are not land animals. I will have to look closer at land animals (lions) eating 'grass'. I had not thought about that aspect before.
2. Yes. Jesus was the light of the world. Rememer; even day 1,2, and3 had light, even though the sun, moon, and stars had not been created yet. Why the sun was created after plants; I currently do not know.
2007-05-10 08:45:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋