English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The bible says that some of the birds had 4 legs.

The atheist says that there has never been a species of bird with 4 legs.

2007-05-10 08:13:40 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

For those that don't think the bible says this, read Leviticus 11:20-21.

For the guy that says it was insects... that is also true, it's another rejection of reality as presented by the bible, check out Leviticus 11:22-23.

These are only TWO of the crazy outright lies in the bible. Read it yourself to find more. And don't just read the passages your pastor tells you to.

2007-05-10 11:42:23 · update #1

Om, that looks like two ducklings to me, not one.

Besides, there are two headed cows and pigs out there too. That does not make them a common species.

2007-05-10 12:21:02 · update #2

Bad Roman, I notice you have nothing to say about the insects anymore... can I take it that you've given up on that argument? Or should I take it that you believe that two thousand years ago there really WERE four legged insects?

2007-05-10 13:30:37 · update #3

Almost forgot, I don't want the earth, it has too many delusional people in it. I just want the delusional people to seek professional help. Can I count on you, Bad Roman, to lead the way by checking yourself into a mental institution?

Oh, yeah, that's right... you think it's normal to talk to and hear from invisible people.

2007-05-10 13:33:53 · update #4

Bad Roman, which version of the bible are you reading? My king james version goes from bird, THEN to insects.. Here's the vers from Leviticus: 20All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you.

What does YOUR KJV say?

2007-05-10 13:48:47 · update #5

16 answers

I saw this months ago, and it wasn't a bird it was an insect. Nice try, but more proof of how much an atheist is willing to misrepresent the facts in order to gain a fraction of earth. Pathetic.

2007-05-10 08:26:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Bible. The atheist doesn't want to admit there are things out there that they can't describe. The Bible is full of things that are truthful, but it also has animals and stuff that we have made extinct. Just because we don't see it or have any evidence of it doesn't mean it didn't excist at one point in time.

2007-05-10 15:33:46 · answer #2 · answered by layajean 2 · 0 0

I obviously don't know enough about the bible or atheism.

Do you count a chickens wings as legs?

2007-05-10 15:16:58 · answer #3 · answered by Agony Aunt 5 · 0 0

Where did you find that birds had four legs in the Bible...PLEASE Prove it!!

2007-05-10 15:23:44 · answer #4 · answered by Commander 6 · 0 0

Not to mention the talking snakes and donkeys, the unicorns, and the pillar of salt.

2007-05-10 15:17:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Where does it say that at? Perhaps it was making reference to the prehistoric dinosaur birds, still I haven't read that in there

2007-05-10 15:16:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

Now I would have said the atheist, until I saw this:

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/img/LON80202171552.jpg

'fraid I'm with god on this 1 :P

2007-05-10 15:17:30 · answer #7 · answered by Om 5 · 0 1

I'm going to go with the atheists.

2007-05-10 15:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by Molly 4 · 1 0

the bible

2007-05-10 15:25:09 · answer #9 · answered by coolio 3 · 0 0

Atheists, but where did one say that?

2007-05-10 15:20:09 · answer #10 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers