Iran's been trying to provoke a war for some time now. Short of putting on their uniforms (in Iraq), I dunno. The "president" of Iran was apparently pleased (according to CNNs Headline News), the day after our November elections, both he and the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq both commended the U.S. people for having voted in the democrats. We know by reviewing history, that the democrats as of late will night fight (at least in a prolonged campaign of any sort). Perhaps if they kidnapped Nancy Pelosy or Harry Reid -- but they'd have to behead them on TV... Naw, it'd be short lived anger.
2007-05-10 03:38:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doc 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Now, for a severe answer. i think of if shall we coach Iran is unquestionably sponsoring people to pass into Iraq with the only purpose of attacking U.S. and allied troops and springing up common chaos, we've provocation sufficient. it truly is often seen an act of war. although, we'd desire to continuously try international kinfolk first. regrettably, this administration isn't the main diplomatic. the previous administration became perchance thank you to diplomatic. looking that high quality line is truly difficult whilst handling international kinfolk. although, interior the face of a breakdown in international kinfolk, we have no recourse left yet to attack Iran. Their kidnapping of British sailors became a prelude to war that became dealt with to no longer properly. i think of the British might desire to have been greater stringent. Sorry, yet once you sign your call on the dotted line saying you would be a soldier to your united states, you especially lots pronounced in case you're put in harms way and something undesirable happens, you already know and entirely settle for the hazards. The British sailors and marines did no longer set a sturdy occasion in this and their government regarded timid to Iran. Like a wild animal, the Iranians can scent the phobia and understand what it ability. i think of that appropriate now Iran is pushing to work out what they are in a position to flee with. If the U.S. withdraws from Iraq now, Iran, Syria, and Turkey will all be shifting for impression over the section. Iran is a unfavourable enemy and one to no longer be taken gently. even as we've the convenience in technologies, their anybody is much greater supportive of the government and can view any attack as a private call to war. they have hundreds of years of journey in combating and it would in all threat effect in guerilla type war. because of the fact of this we'd desire to continuously try international kinfolk first. If it got here all the way down to a justified war with Iran, i think of shall we win, yet at an exceptionally intense value in lives, supplies, and money.
2016-12-17 09:04:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To me, Iran would have to personally attack the United States or Great Britain.
I am not a soldier, but I don't think we should be fighting other countries' wars anymore, with the exception to Britain, because they have our backs in this debacle we're in right now.
2007-05-10 02:58:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Angel in Hell 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
They would have to formally declare war, with the UN Security Council being officially involved! Let their embassy officials draft a formal letter declaring such and then deliver it through official formal channels to the US government! Other than that legally it will not matter from our side until then!
2007-05-10 04:53:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jake 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have not got our nose out of Iraq yet and your worrying about Iran?
I do not think we would have 1/2 the problems we have with other Countries if we would mind our own business and quit trying to tell other people how to live.
2007-05-10 03:02:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Not Me!! 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
well historically their a oil tycoon.
For 30 years nearly it has been Saddam who has held them at bay..
Suddendly we have taken out Saddam and left a rather unstable Iraq.
As youcan see their doing things to help keep Iraq unstable.
I feel heavily that if we pull out and Iraq is not 100% secure, there will be war.
2007-05-10 04:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know.
I'd have to think long and hard about how long it would take for us to succeed in Iran against how long it would take the moonbats to build up enough critical mass to force another cut and run.
2007-05-10 03:05:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would say kidnapping 50 or so of our citizens and holding them ransom for a year. Oh wait...
2007-05-10 03:03:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by John L 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
since alot of our"leaders" dont have the stomach to fight Id say it may take them launching a Nuke at DC.
2007-05-10 03:22:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Gentlemen, start your engines !
2007-05-10 03:27:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
0⤊
1⤋