Three weeks ago I asked questions about the reasons for one and what to expect. Some responses were helpful but I really didn't get all the answers I was looking for. Do you know the differences in what a Nuclear stress test are getting that make it more advantageous than an echocardiogram?
I was also told how bad the test was. In my opinion, the test itself really was not a big deal. There was slight discomfort in inserting the needle, but I felt nothing from the injection itself. It took about three and a quarter hour from start to finish, but before they can take the initial pictures you have time to grap a bite to eat.
The beginning of Apheresis is probablymore uncomfortable than this injection, but I would still encourage people do Apheresis to help others rather than shy away from a slight discomfort. The same with this test. IF a doctor has a good reason (I still am not sure what my doctor's was) don't panic..it is a relatively easy test.
2007-05-06
02:13:19
·
1 answers
·
asked by
guppy137
4
in
Health
➔ Diseases & Conditions
➔ Heart Diseases
For anyone who may be interested, what I found out during the test is that the overall difference in why this test might be ordered over an echo cardiogram is that the echo cardiogram focuses more on the valves of the heart, while this test focuses on the heart walls.
2007-05-06
06:59:22 ·
update #1