Like all these cheap sweepstakes ads need to be replaced with bigger companies.
2007-04-22 11:04:21 · 7 answers · asked by poke 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Advertising & Marketing ➔ Other - Advertising & Marketing
I don't understand the wasteful part. Can you be more explicative in your description of the wasteful ads and elaborate on the subject of cheap sweepstakes ads? Maybe with some intelligible and informative content we won't have to be wandering around the interpretive wasteland.
2007-04-22 11:16:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe it's wasteful. People see the ad and they click on it (if, and only if, they are interested, like if they're thinking of buying a car, then they will click on the chevy ad the next time it pops up.
2007-04-22 20:16:43 · answer #2 · answered by taram 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u follow this website its profitable with arid marketing. For the greatest results u market ur website with effective slogans and banners why dont u use this website. Its very cheap and grant u printouts of ur banners.
http://www.vividads.com.au
2007-04-27 01:19:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally do not click on ads, but there are a lot of people out there that do. Clicks generate revenue.
2007-04-22 21:31:58 · answer #4 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't wasteful, or companies wouldn't spend their advertising dollars on it.
2007-04-22 18:11:40 · answer #5 · answered by lynda_is 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who says it's wasteful?
2007-04-22 18:54:09 · answer #6 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
how it is wasteful? it's not.
2007-04-30 13:37:14 · answer #7 · answered by tasbirahmed_buet 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋