You need to be asking Mr. George W this one.
2007-04-22 09:55:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The way to end the war is this:
Look at Korea look at Vietnam. Two failures.
We should split Iraq in three, one area for Suni's
another for Kurd's, and lastly for Shi'ites. Then If
nessecary spilt this into three independent countries.
Place military bases in each region or country to prevent
imperialism. Establish a military for the country against terror,
make sure it can handle the terrorist's then leave as fast as we
can.
2007-04-22 09:58:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by siopses777 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq is a needed piece of the midsection East jigsaw (for a minimum of 6000 years!). the united kingdom reneged on its promise to Palestinian Arabs that they might have their independence after WWI (we've been compelled by employing the French who needed hegemony in this section). The Zionist circulation had and has good hyperlinks to the U. S. governing instructions and persuaded them to cajole us to help a countrywide native land for Jews to be set up in Israel (even although the Palestinians had a flourishing u . s . there already!) - so the united kingdom now had 2 gadgets of folk the two promised rights over the comparable territory and that's the place that conflict comes from. After WWII Russia grew good and needed topersistent its impact right down to the Persian Gulf with a view to have southern ports different than those interior the Black Sea. This frightened america of a who had exchange into based on Arab and Iranian oil so as that they set approximately arising shopper states interior the section including Jordan, Kuwait and Iraq. They and the united kingdom placed Saddam Hussein in potential because of the fact he provided a "good solid" government and alter into implacably adversarial to Iran the place the ayatollahs have been taking on. even if he theory he might desire to apply his Western help in his very own scheme to strengthen south and west into Kuwait and Jordan yet this broke needed u . s . treaty delivers so as that they tried to hold him into line with operation "barren area hurricane". This backfired and the section grew to become dangerously risky so a 2nd operation exchange into released to certainly topple him which ought to have been executed the 1st time or on no account. This 2nd conflict destroyed maximum of the fundamental infrastructure of Iraq (outfitted by employing the West!) and greater importantly unfolded the fracture strains in Iraq. america of a and uk are caught with a clean "Vietnam/Korea" different than that it particularly is nice on the fundamental oil and gasoline furnish strains. Iraq was a remarkable u . s . with a good intelligentsia and greater non secular and political communities than the different interior the international. It now looks to have descended to barbarism. As to the conflict on Terror - this is going to basically make issues worse even if this is a robust thank you to introduce totalitarian measures interior the Western strikes under the guise of risk-free practices. they are even seeking to hold the internet "into line".
2016-10-13 05:14:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows but as long as the terrorists aren't attacking and Iran isn't able to take over Iraq it's a plan thats working.
2007-04-22 09:55:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Objective? To settle the insurgency, and get ready to fight Iran. (We should of fought them the first time, not Iraq).
2007-04-22 09:55:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The objective is to deny the terrorists the ability to attack us here in the US and we do this by killing the main terrorist leaders such as Osama bin laden. .
2007-04-22 11:51:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by A question or two... 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think how much profit Bush and his friends can make off this "war" is the metric.
2007-04-22 09:53:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Get the oil. Kill everyone.
2007-04-22 09:52:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kill as many Muslims as possible and steal their country's oil.
2007-04-22 09:53:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
you have two separate questions there pal.
2007-04-22 09:52:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋