English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Don't know who he is, but the really hilarious thing about this whole issue is that faith is not a subject that is debateable. It is a subjective matter, wholely at the discretion of the one who chooses to believe. As a believer, I don't have to justify or validate my belief or faith to any person. If someone were to simply ask me, "Why do you believe in God?", that would be a different matter. But even then, my answer would not be acceptable to one who already has an agenda. They say the best way to deal with an arbitrary statement is to ignore it. I guess the same thing applies to arbitrary questions that aren't really seeking an answer, only contention. As for Ray Comfort(?), he can do whatever it is he feels he has to do. I certainly don't need him to speak for me, as my record of answers in this forum certainly do attest. I have yet to meet the "genius" in this place who can persuade me to not believe in God.

2007-04-22 09:01:35 · answer #1 · answered by vox populi 3 · 0 0

they might have executed better to ask Francis Collins, director of the nationwide Human Genome study Institute and author of _The Language of God: A Scientist grants evidence for Belief_. He in no way might have sunk so low as to tug out an artist's rendering of a crocoduck. That became into even lamer than the banana protection. The producer of the section and his editor did an rather poor job with final night's "Face Off." they might desire to have shown much less Bashir and build-up and greater content textile from the communicate. We not often have been given a teaspoon of the arguments, and how they have been edited at the same time made them look somewhat disconnected and incoherent. i individually concept Bashir confirmed favoritism to the Christian apologists. He interviewed them head to head, as damaging to having the atheists' comments taped as they have been status in the hallway. The sound blend on the Christians' voices became into far more suitable, lending a subliminal income. And it somewhat became into unethical of the sound editors to contain the atheists' sotto voce comments to a minimum of one yet another: "What a nutjob!" in my view, the manufacturers would desire to have run the finished debate, or as much as might have crammed the finished length of Nightline, axing that different fluff section approximately...i've got forgotten what, it became into so trivial.

2016-12-10 08:43:12 · answer #2 · answered by okamura 4 · 0 0

OMG I was just watching him do the banana thing on youtube. Yes, I would choose him. He is really funny. It would be great. Just to watch him do that and see the atheists watching in horror would be good enough for me. All the confusion and anger that would erupt on both sides is well worth the money and time to schedule this event.

2007-04-22 08:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 3 1

I bought a whole pineapple a couple of weeks ago... If the banana is proof that God intelligently designed us, the pineapple is proof that he hates us.

2007-04-22 08:58:28 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 0 0

No, they like Mike from Growing Pains.

2007-04-22 08:51:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I was worried about you. I thought you may have been deleted. I haven't seen you on.
As for your question, I don't know who that is.

2007-04-22 08:51:35 · answer #6 · answered by Me 6 · 0 0

No

2007-04-22 08:51:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers