Because if you do, read this;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070422/hl_...
If that doesn't convince you then I'm afraid you're beyond hope.
Viruses, just like every other living thing on this planet, evolve. Some quickly, some slowly. But they do.
That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and theory.
(yes both are true. If you knew anything about actual science, and not just the made up crap you read in Chick comics, you'd know that)
2007-04-22
07:15:50
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Yoda Green
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
"viruses are not living"
A stupider comment I have not read on Yahoo answers before. Congrats, you've lowered the IQ of everyone reading here with that answer.
2007-04-22
12:37:08 ·
update #1
Wabbit,
you're a moron did you know that?
First you say Evolution doesn't happen and then start talking about the big bang. Clue for you pal, free of charge, the two have NOTHING to do with each other.
2007-04-22
12:38:35 ·
update #2
Sorry to me the flowers in a basket makes more sense than evolution.
2007-04-22 07:19:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by alphaomegadisciple 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
Actually, viruses don't technically classify as life. They are kinda like the pre-cursor to life - a bio-mechanical module with the ability to replicate parasitically (and spontaneously).
This is actually a topic of debate in the scientific world and has significant implications if viruses ARE to be considered life.
2007-04-23 06:59:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't have a problem with evolution provided it continues in the area it is best suited for. I have a problem with people conceiving dates and information that is easily disputed and proven to exist in answers that do not support the views taken by evolutionist
2007-04-22 14:25:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh, leave the little dummies alone. Cool name, BTW. Yoda rocks!!!! (He believes in evolution, too. Through the force evolution works. Hmmmm.)
2007-04-22 15:08:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Emily H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution NEVER HAPPENED. PLEASE READ ON.
Now, first of all, where did the big bang come from? noone knows. what triggered it, and how in the world is a nuclear explosion supposed to CREATE something instead of blowing stuff up? It's like blowing up nagasaki in world war 2 and instead of tens of thousands of people dead, there's a whole new world forming!!! A whole NEW EARTH!!! A mini-sized planet somehow suited expecially for life with water and land masses and air and everything!!!
Second, I would like to question the lightning and pond theory. Where did the bacteria come from? OF course it came from a bolt of lightning that somehow came from nothing and struck a pond of water that somehow existed in AFRICA (ahem, where 49% of the current population live on less than $1 a day and have to walk up to 40 miles for the nearest source of water)!!! LAUGH OUT LOUD!!! NO, lightning never struck a pond!!! Masses of carbon did not come by themselves to form bacteria, either!!! Do you realize that a single cell organism is so complex and so dificult to take apart and examine because it is made up of over A THOUSAND different parts, such as membrane, nucleus, mitochondria, etc.? There is absolutely NO WAY this complex creature could have been formed by chance. Even with the most sophisticated equipment in labs and the most elaborate and expensive machinery capable of producing artificial bolts of lightning, extremely smart scientists with ph.D's from all over the world have not been able to do this amazing feat!!! In addition, I believe every living organism contains DNA, or deoxiribonucleic acid.
I believe I am correct in saying that DNA contains over ONE MILLION pages of information in one strand alone, which is waaaaay too much for one lightning bolt and one pond to handle to try to create light.
Third and lastly, but not least, have you noticed that evolution consists of lies and dishonesty? Even scientists with ph.D's who have tried to prove evolution true have lied to everyone, including you. Ever hear of the Piltdown man story? well, it is now considered one of the most deceitful frauds ever concocted in the history of science. An evolutionist took two human skulls, claimed they were thousands of years old (when they were actually less than 600) and attached an orangutan's jaw, thus creating a fake "ape-man." It was later disproved when another scientist noticed something strange (that the colors did not exactly match) and took it apart and saw the fraud. Need I tell you of the Nebraska man story? The one about creating an entire man and his family with just the tooth of a pig? Need I tell you about Neanderthal man, an old person with rickets and arthritis? Need I go on, telling you about the deceitful claims made up by evolutionists desperately trying to prove their THEORY right?
NOTE: The THEORY of evoltuion is, indeed, a theory. If it is a fact, then why do people still call it the "THEORY of evolution?" Because no stupid evolutionist scientist with ph.D's like Stanley Miller have been able to prove it true, even after nearly 150 years after the ORIGIN OF SPEICES' publish.
Look on the link below for more info.
By the way, I'm a college graduate with a ph.D, too.
2007-04-22 14:44:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
In the Holy Name of Jesus Christ - I cast your virus out!!!
A virus does not have its origin in its own life. It is a mutation of what is already genetically in another life form and then mutates after its aberration. Viruses are an aberration of genetic materials producing various kinds of interference with human flesh. It is a mutant genetic life form that seems to have a mind of its own.
Thou Evil Spirit of Infirmity in the name of Jesus Christ, I cast you out.
Luke 13:11-12
And behold, there was a woman which had a spirit of infirmity eighteen years, and was bowed together, and could in no wise lift up herself. And when Jesus saw her, He called her to Him, and said unto her, Woman, thou art loosed from thine infirmity.
2007-04-22 14:46:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Uh huh.... do you understand the difference between Allele shift and species transformation??
Doubt it...
The fact that you consider me to be beyond hope... really doesn't matter much to me. I do not place my hope in you.
Your statement...."this is scientific fact and theory" is laughable... which is it, fact or theory... it can't be both.
It's obvious by your question that your grasp of "actual" science is suspect at best.
Let me know when you get a clue.
2007-04-22 14:25:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Dude, they're just gonna come at you with that Macro/Micro BS they love to use so much. They are too dim to understand that microevolution is simply the small steps between macroevolution and that no self respecting evolutionary scientist uses either of those terms.
Edit: your link is broken too.
2007-04-22 14:20:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Viruses are not living, buddy
2007-04-22 14:21:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes , I do not accept evolution. So we done yet?
Jesus LOVES You....
2007-04-22 14:23:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Free At Last!!! 2
·
1⤊
1⤋