English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I will give best answer to however can give the best reason or evidence for there view. i obviously have my opinion but I want to know why people have theres

2007-04-22 06:42:57 · 25 answers · asked by Moon Chav 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

25 answers

I totally feel that it must be evolution, the whole reason the human body is so complex is because it changed progressively over millions of years, not because someone decided that was how it would be. Evolution is still happening in humans, just look at how things have changed in the last thousand years; subtle changes in average height and longevity, that is all evolution.

I leave you with a quote from David Attenborough that I think sums up this arguement perfectly:

"My response is that when Creationists talk about God creating every individual species as a separate act, they always instance hummingbirds, or orchids, sunflowers and beautiful things. But I tend to think instead of a parasitic worm that is boring through the eye of a boy sitting on the bank of a river in West Africa, [a worm] that's going to make him blind. And [I ask them], 'Are you telling me that the God you believe in, who you also say is an all-merciful God, who cares for each one of us individually, are you saying that God created this worm that can live in no other way than in an innocent child's eyeball? Because that doesn't seem to me to coincide with a God who's full of mercy."

Powerful stuff from a brilliant man!

I would love to hear any views on that statement from anyone here that believes creationism happened.

2007-04-22 07:06:38 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfboy 2 · 3 0

The fact that the universe exists means it had an origin. If it had an origin, it had a cause. The one who caused the universe to come into existence is its Creator. Therefore creation is an obvious truth.

Which if course has absolutely nothing to do with the fact, clearly demonstrated by science and supported by vast evidence, that already existing, that is, already created organisms change biologically over time, eventually giving rise to new species. This is an incontrovertible fact.

So the only correct and knowledgeable answer is - Both! Both Creation and evolution are clearly demonstrable and logically essential facts. Since both are true, there can be no conflict between them, since truth cannot conflict with truth. Therefore the question "creation or evolution?" is meaningless.
.

2007-04-22 07:00:52 · answer #2 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1 2

For me it's evolution and the simplest argument i have is my five fingers, the five fingers on the raccoon that visits my yard periodically and the five finger bones in whales. If god made whales to swim why give him any of the same structures as humans? Evolution answers the question trivially (common ancestry). Creation just avers that it's intelligent design without explaining what's intelligent about it. Occam's razor dictates that the simplest solution is probably the correct one - in this case (and others like it) it's evolution.

2007-04-22 07:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Evolution-there is evidence everywhere I look- Pakistani Muslims(or just Muslims in general) are living proof that the rest of our species is evolving at a much higher rate.
Richard Dawkins and the late great Carl Sagan can offer much more insightful thoughts than the retarded scum who waste their time on this site(One includes oneself in that comment)

2007-04-22 07:44:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Both evolution is proven due to fossils tho you were created in a lab scary Kerry you are a Munster. Dinosaurs proves the bible is a lie as by creating dinosaurs first god would be a lizard the only lizard King is Jim morrison

2007-04-22 07:01:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I go with creation. one if you keep asking the question why ultimately there is only one answer. that answer is God. in evolution pretty muchall, if not, all the common ancestors are still missing links. scientist to this day still can not agree if the earth is old enough to support evolution. there are scientists out there that are so stubborn and whole heartedly against God that the say aliens seeded earth to watch evolution like a science project. if God is a ridiculous idea because we can't see him, touch or smell him then aliens are just as ridiculous.

2007-04-22 07:06:48 · answer #6 · answered by clown(s) around 6 · 0 2

I say creation I don't feel that man was what was originally created because Science proves that theory is wrong but for there to be any thing or anybody something had to be created and man was evolved from that, Something that is close n nature I do not believe a chimp, but something more similar to us had to be created and has yet to be discovered by man

2007-04-22 08:15:27 · answer #7 · answered by leschal 2 · 0 1

Evolution. Because it's not based just one source, like Creation.

2007-04-22 06:48:14 · answer #8 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 3 0

Your name should be John Scary!

Evolution. There's scientific evidence supporting evolution.

2007-04-22 06:50:45 · answer #9 · answered by Judge Rudy 5 · 2 0

I dont see why it cant be both
why wouldnt a clever creator realise the need for evolution in an ever changing world
why wouldnt the creator see that climate and geography would require change

2007-04-22 06:50:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers