who really knocked down the wtc? and why? and what hit the pentagon?

Question

okay supposedly it was osama bin laden but i dont think it was. did you see the video of goerge w bush where he slipped up and said that osama's terrorists were planting bombs on the wtc? i thought it was supposed to ba a plane! but he said bombs
i think if the feds lie they should lie better! i was also wondering what hit the pentagon. because some witnesses said it looked like a missile but after the feds talked to them they changed their minds could they have been blackmailed into it?

Answer 1

If you think that the pentagon was not hit by a plane....I dare you to say these to an American Airlines Pilot. I am sure my friend who lost his friends (pilots) in that crash would hit you in the nose for that question.

Also that portion of the pentagon had recently been reinforced and included bomb blast resistant windows and walls. Thats why it didnt fall like the WTC. It was also a lot stronger design then WTC. Also people say where is the parts of the plane? ok where is the parts of the WTC planes? I will tell you airplanes are made of Aluminum. it burns and melts away at very low tempature.

As far as bush saying bombs, yes bush is an idiot at times and must have eaten lead paint chips. He has often messed up words and usies words he seems to make up.

Also the planes were used as bombs. Didnt you see all the videos of this or do you think that was staged?

I know am a building inspector and the WTC was designed much diferent then most buildings. it was designed with a truss system not the tradition I beams. The asbestos on the I beams was shacken and blown/blasted off the trusses and was not a monocoat type it was a more fiberous and easy to remove type asbestos fireproofing. Also the outskin of the building was very strong and is why the building fell in on itself so well. it had nothing to do with any misterious bombs.

Answer 2

It's hard to deny the fact that planes hit the WTC. Whether or not they were the ultimate cause of the collapse, millions of people watched at least one plane hit.

A more plausible conspiracy theory is flight 93. Given the amount of time available, it's more plausible that 93 was shot down over rural Pennsylvania about 12 minutes (given the distance, and the cruising speed of the Boeing 757) away from the major population centers of Washington D.C and Baltimore Maryland. The f/a 18 Hornets stationed at Andrew Air force base, with a top speed of more than twice the 757 (mach 0.8 on the 757, mach 1.8 on the Hornet.), would have had no problem intercepting the hijacked plane.

As for the pentagon, it's probable that it was hit by a plane simply because any government would have a hard time hiding a jumbo jet. Flight 77 went up, it had to come down somewhere.

We won't know what really happened in our lifetimes, or our children's' lifetimes. And if you choose to believe that flight 93 was shot down, remember this. Those passengers were dead. Whether they were going to be shot down, or whether they were going to be flown into a building, those people were going to die. The right decision, given the circumstances, would have been to shoot down the plane and save as many lives as possible. However, how many grieving family members wouldn't have accepted that? The lie makes the passengers heroes, and gives the families of the victims closure. I think we can all live with that.

Answer 3

Actually, Bush did not knock down the towers. All of the conspiracy theories have been proven false. I mean, the terrorists had started training in some cases ten years before the attacks. So this means that Bush knew he was going to win the Presidency ten years ahead of time.

Answer 4

Owen, I have a new flash for you. I had friends at the Pentagon. I had friends that died at the pentagon and WTC.Why don't you get your head out of your BUTT and smell the sweet success of life. I know, withj your head where it is, will be a miracle day when it smells sweet.

A DAMED plane hit the PENTAGON and the WTC. Damn, where do you folks crawl out from under.

Answer 5

The terrorist did. Why because they are as*holes. Have you ever visited ground zero? Maybe if you see it for yourself, the last time I went there I was seriously considering re-enlisting in the Marine Corps.

Answer 6

If not the terrorists I believe Rhodan was the most likely culprit.

Answer 7

saudi arabians - a**hole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

but i also love these conspiracy theorists who seem to forget that the bush administration is literally the gang that couldn't shoot straight - and could get the old and sick out of new orleans FIVE DAYS after a hurricane.

lets face it, the bush admin just isn't capable of faking 9/11.

ever since 9/11 it has been frightfully evident that bush is in way over his head.

Answer 8

What do you think that the american gouvernment can pull off? Kill JFK, hide aliens and do the 9/11??? Give me a break! Please get back to the real world and stop dreaming so much!!! Johan

Answer 9

I believe it was terrorists and I also believe they were working out of afghanistan, not from Iraq, which brings up the question why are we in Iraq? WMD's? That weren't there and were never there, which Bush cleverly covered up by saying well they had the ability to build WMD's in 10 years or so... so does Kenya, so does any country, but in answer to your question I don't think it was a cover up

Answer 10

If the feds did it, one of them would have leaked all ready as they always do. Beyond that you have no evidence to corroborate your statement, just some badly typed words. A link would help.