What chu talkin' bout, Willis?
2007-04-22 03:52:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like to call it "Pascal's Flaw" because I agree with the suggestion, "that the wager does not account for the possibility that there is a god (or gods) who, rather than behaving as stated in certain parts of the bible, instead rewards skepticism and punishes blind faith, or rewards honest reasoning and punishes feigned faith."
Or truly as I believe, there is no god, so I'm not going to waste my time worshipping an unproven non-existant.
2007-04-22 11:06:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Primordial Soup 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
aethists , non-followers of the prayings of the god_0 denies the wagers argument as this is the base of every belief system that is captured by god_0 they prefer to go to the zoo to eat icecream in stead of attending the holy god_0 in his house
2007-04-22 10:58:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by gjmb1960 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
When someone says that they won't waste their time worshiping an unproven deity, what they mean is that seeking their own personal happiness is more important than having real meaning in their life.
2007-04-23 05:35:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matthew T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
On no not another pint of Vodka Redbull, I was looking forward to Starbucks...
2007-04-22 10:53:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, I don't understand your question, but I am taking two swigs anyway.
Bottoms up!
2007-04-22 11:07:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dawn G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whoooo! drinking time!
2007-04-22 11:11:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋