http://www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail.php?PubID=1669
http://www.climatescience.org.nz/assets/20073142034430.BBCclimateQaire2.pdf
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm
This is a newspaper article with quotes from scientists:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm
Here is a scientist explains why he left the IPCC, and how their conclusion on Hurricanes and global warming is not the consensus that was reached:
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/science_policy_general/000318chris_landsea_leaves.html
2007-04-20 19:14:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by eric c 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Maybe look on the Internet for your answer.Heyy, Al Gore is great - he makes global warming easy to understand, and seems to have all of the scientific backup to what he says.
2007-04-20 19:00:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by sun_beam61 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Full interviews:
http://news.com.com/Humans+fiddle+while+the+planet+heats+up/2008-11392_3-6172739.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,476275,00.html
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~frank/BerkeleyGroks_Schneider.htm
http://www.vega.org.uk/video/programme/119
http://video.nbc4.com/player/?id=59901
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wnpr/arts.artsmain?action=viewArticle&sid=15&id=963982&pid=173
http://www.satyamag.com/april01/mastny.html
Quotes (you could use Google to find sources):
"Global warming is already starting, and there's going to be more of it. I think there is still time to deal with global warming, but we need to act soon. Humans now control global climate, for better or worse."
James Hansen, Ph.D. climate scientist, NASA
"Global warming is the most challenging problem our society has ever had to face up to. Ice is the canary in the coal mine of global warming."
Britain's chief scientist David King
"By mid-century, millions more poor children around the world are likely to face displacement, malnourishment, disease and even starvation unless all countries take action now to slow global warming."
Michael Oppenheimer, professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University
“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."
Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont (Engineer)
"We are not saying that the Earth's temperature is just going to rise. In general, as energy is added to a system, the fluctuations in the system increase. So, we expect more storms, more droughts, more wildfires, more floods, more fluctuations of all kinds. What we are saying is that weather conditions will become more volatile due to the impact of humans."
-- S. Mukherjee & D. Brouse (2004)
"The drafting of reports by the world’s pre-eminent group of climate scientists is an odd process. For many months scientists contributing to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tussle over the evidence. Nothing gets published unless it achieves consensus. This means that the panel’s reports are extremely conservative – even timid. It also means that they are as trustworthy as a scientific document can be."
George Monbiot
In 2005, Annan offered to take Lindzen, the MIT meteorologist, up on his bet that global temperatures in 20 years will be cooler than they are now. However, no wager was ever settled on because Lindzen wanted odds of 50-to-1 in his favor. This meant that for a $10,000 bet, Annan would have to pay Lindzen the entire sum if temperatures dropped, but receive only $200 if they rose.
“Richard Lindzen’s words say that there is about a 50 percent chance of [global] cooling,” Annan wrote about the bet. “His wallet thinks it is a 2 percent shot. Which do you believe?”
James Annan, a climate scientist at the Frontier Research Center for Global Change in Japan
NASA's Gavin Schmidt
"Regardless of these spats, the fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the AGU or EGU meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists (not the famous ones, the ones at your local university or federal lab). I challenge you, if you think there is some un-reported division, show me the hundreds of abstracts at the Fall meeting (the biggest confernce in the US on this topic) that support your view - you won't be able to. You can argue whether the consensus is correct, or what it really implies, but you can't credibly argue it doesn't exist." -gavin
Dr. James Baker - NOAA
"There's a better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue I know - except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics". -Deltoid, ECOS Letter
Jerry Mahlman, NOAA
"Global warming is almost a no-brainer at this point," said Mahlman, who lives now on a mountain in Colorado. "You really can't find intelligent, quantitative arguments to make it go away." - The Star Ledger, Tempest brews in weather think tank
"We've got about 20 years to turn (greenhouse gas emissions) around or it's going to cost the world a lot environmentally but also economically," said Terry Hughes, a leading Australian coral specialist.
2007-04-20 19:25:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob 7
·
0⤊
1⤋