2007-04-20 17:23:03 · 16 answers · asked by Nick M 1 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Hunting
Is that a God given gift or did you go to school for that?
Just how much of that fine Kentucky corn squeezing did you have to consume to ask that question?
Any one that cant tell the difference between a bear and a fool in a bear suit, then in my book both of them need shot.
If you keep drinking that sour mash your going to find your self running around town naked acting like a chicken.
Now do you understand why they call that stuff White Lightning!
Lord have mercy
D58
2007-04-20 18:55:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No it's just good practical since.The person with the bear suit on is more than likely crazy and needs some mental help so shooting him would be the best thing for everyone.His family will get his pension check and he will be out of his misery plus the streets will be safer not having a stray bear walking around.
2007-04-21 06:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like D58's answer.
It should be ruled as an accident and the shooter should go free. Living with the guilt of knowing he killed someone should be punishment enough, and the dude in the bear suit got his punishment for being stupid. However, with so many idiot lawyers, and so many stupid people pushing for gun control/bans, he would probably go to jail for life and there would be a bunch more stupid gun control and hunting laws.
2007-04-20 19:10:34 · answer #3 · answered by Leroy McCoy 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
man if some idiot is stupid enough to be walking around the woods wearing a bear suit in bear season he needs to be shot. these are the kind of people that piss me off! I swear who would wear a bear suit in the woods? How retarded is that? What kind of stupid question is this anyways? i think whoever wrote this question needs to put on a bear suit themselves and hopefully if we are all lucky enough someone will do us all a favor and rid us of this insolence.
2007-04-20 17:33:23 · answer #4 · answered by songstressforgod 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I examine the tale and its quite tragic. The shooter of course did no longer become attentive to his aim, yet he became in actuality submit to searching. The hiker became definately in the incorrect place. there isn't any regulation to stay clear of human beings from working thorugh the woods. and an excellent style of states require hunters to positioned on orange, yet no longer for hikers. There are not any signs and warning signs up telling non- hunters that they are in searching territory or that season is open. a ways too many human beings "anticipate" too lots. i can work out the place the two have been in the incorrect. yet that would not make it suitable the two.
2016-12-20 20:22:57 · answer #5 · answered by sheck 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that scenario actually happened, the hunter should have his eyes checked and the idiot in the bear suit would win a "Darwin" award.
2007-04-20 17:57:09 · answer #6 · answered by C_F_45 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the answers get dumber every day.why would the guy be wearing a bear suit?if you knew the guy was a fake and you killed him it would be nurder
2007-04-21 21:28:50 · answer #7 · answered by charlsyeh 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL we have to thin that heard. Where do these questions come from. There are some strange people here.
2007-04-20 18:00:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he could because he did not properly identify his target...The shooter is responsible legally and could also be sued for it..
2007-04-21 06:18:07 · answer #9 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you planning on killing your freind who is trying to get u some bigfoot video
2007-04-21 03:42:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋