English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If that bonehead hadn't used the christian cult to get rid of his enemies in the pagan bourgeois elite then there would be no christianity in the world today. (Ok, maybe a very small cult.)
Since that is the case, is he ultimately responsible for the Dark Ages, Crusades, Inquisition, Witch Hunts, etc?

2007-04-20 11:23:30 · 8 answers · asked by Biggest Douche in the Universe 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

hehehe.....I wonder what he would have thought had he seen the end of the Roman world and the subsequent Dark Ages. All learning out the window. The Library at Alexandria destroyed and knowledge pillaged for subsequent generations..what a loss!

2007-04-20 11:40:31 · answer #1 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 1 0

The position of the Roman Emperor Constantine in Christianity is most suitable understood if we understand "the city of God" differs from "the city of guy." also, examine contained in the letters of John the position it says do no longer love the international or something contained in the international for guy who loves the international has no longer the love of the daddy in him. i trust Constantine used Christianity to assist carry the Roman Empire mutually. It worked contained in the quick run. I question his convienient conversion at Milan. The Empire of Rome replaced into nonetheless in shambles lower than some a lengthy time period later. he's not the in straightforward words flesh presser to attempt to regulate Christianity for political income. there is not any longer area the following for a communicate of ways the embracing of the Roman Empire presented in distorted teachings on Easter, Christmas, the priesthood, confession, transubstation, a guy forgiving sin and assigning penance--Jesus is the in straightforward words man or woman who can do this. Frankly, i imagine the Christian Church ought to and is more advantageous without those mispractices. hence, the Church must be more advantageous and purer if Constantine had not in any respect ruled. The form Church replaced into the Church of Acts. It had great religious power and boom, and no political power. praise God contained in the sixteenth Century Martin Luther tried to carry us decrease back to this simplier and extra Biblical Church, nonpolitical yet very holy Acts.

2016-12-04 09:26:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Will you be responsible for the future actions of your descendants? No, you have no real control over the future actions of other free persons. Constantine cannot be the one to blame for the actions of misguided believers that came hundreds of years after him.

2007-04-20 11:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by wonbongkim 2 · 0 1

It's his mothers fault.

Seriously, she was the one who nagged him into converting and letting the Christians off the hook.

And look at what happened!

Europe down the toilet for how many centuries?

2007-04-20 11:28:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Not to mention the switching of holidays...Sabbath...& instituting a bunch of other ridiculous things not taught in Scripture.

2007-04-20 11:39:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No he is not! God is the reason why christanity exist today.

2007-04-20 11:36:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Lol

2007-04-20 11:26:59 · answer #7 · answered by Austen 2 · 1 0

He was a murderer himself... killed his own wife, family members... pah.

_()_

2007-04-20 11:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by vinslave 7 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers