I would like Charlton Heston to answer . Please give him a nudge if you know him.
2007-04-20 10:40:33 · 26 answers · asked by Spartan L 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
50 yearss....
2007-04-20 10:44:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anon Helper 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
90% of those that went to school have been bullied. I think they will go to home schooling before they change the gun laws.
Japan already bans civilians from having guns, yet a Japanese mayor was shot to death the same day those people in Virginia Tech were. There have also been a couple of school attacks in Japan in the last couple of years where the students were stabbed.
2007-04-20 10:54:29 · answer #2 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The truth is, the federal gun laws in place would have stopped him but Virginia's guns laws supersedes the federal laws in this case.
Because Cho was deemed unstable by a judge under federal statutes he shouldn't have been sold a gun. In Virginia a person has to have been committed to a mental institute before his gun rights would be taken away.
It's Virginia's fault.
2007-04-20 10:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by my_alias_id 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We have gun control laws in place, but they are not being enforce. Everywhere law abiding citizen are allow to carry guns, the crime rate goes down. Look at Washington DC where gun are illegal.
If one student or teacher had a legal gun at VT, then there may have been less people killed.
2007-04-20 10:54:51 · answer #4 · answered by bbj1776 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Funny, I was wondering just how much more before we stop protecting the crazies of the world from the damage they do to the rest of us. How many times was he reported for his strange behavior? Why did it take something like this to happen, and why couldn't something have been done before this to prevent it? I know, he had RIGHTS, well what about the rights of the everybody else? When does that start counting for anything?
2007-04-20 10:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They would give everyone guns so that he would have been shot by someone else after the first few. It is too late for your country. Even if they banned guns only good people would stop having them, there would still be thousands avaliable to whoever wants them.
2007-04-20 10:47:17 · answer #6 · answered by mafewoooooo 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You have it right. THe NRA will need to understand the role that they have had in all of this, beginning with their absolute refusal to read and understand the whole of the second amendment.
This was a part of the argument that Michael Moore made in "Bowling for Columbine". He was also unable to get an answer from Heston, despite the fact that Moore is an NRA member.
Until they do, the only answer is never.
2007-04-20 10:50:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
incredibly you're able to confer with a lawyer, to be sure what rules have been violated and what you're able to do. additionally he could provide each and every of the presents back. He doesnt want them and that they seem to be a persevering with reminder of infedelity interior the marriage. Mabey if she gets the presents back she will pass away, because of the fact she would be happy. confer together with her back. Dont snicker at her. Be trustworthy and tell her you like your husband and additionally you're a kin and are going to continuously stay mutually. tell her that she is being a homewrecker and needs to discover a guy who doesnt already have a women individuals. additionally do pass to counceling with him. in case you like one yet another and are desperate to artwork it out you will possibly be able to desire to adress your issues. Dont permit him off the hook to surely. Make him coach he's trouble-free. reliable good fortune. you're a reliable women individuals who has continued lots. it gets extra stable in the previous it gets extra handy.
2016-10-28 14:01:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK...if there was a car crash in Va that killed 32 people every day, how many months b4 they make it illegal to drive cars? 1? 5? 30? 200?
People kill people. With weapons, cars, bare hands, and drugs...etc.
2007-04-20 12:16:33 · answer #9 · answered by Hootiesplace 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People, that have children no less, have owned arms for hundreds of years. How many 'VT''s do we need to see before parents begin raising their children with morals, an instilled value of human life, respect for others and intelligence?
It's like the other age-old argument... do we outlaw cars because people get killed with them? Or do you teach responsible driving?
.
2007-04-20 10:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by twowords 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Far more people are killed everyday by automoblie accidents but you don't see us banning autos now do you.
Also we only have these kinds of tragedies right after or right before elections just so you know.
2007-04-20 11:30:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋