In Antarctica, they are studying the ice pack to see the past, and CO2 has been at its peak when ever the earth has been in a heating cycle, however, CO2 had not exceeded the 150 ppm level until recently where it is now 340ppm. This may not seem like a lot, but in terms of nature is a disaster.
In order to make a significant difference, we MUST make large scale efforts. That means everyone must contribute as much as they can to eliminate the use of coal burning electric plants, wasted water, and other harmful practices from our current lifestyles.
Global warming will only get worse until people get scared enough to do something about it.
It is estimated that even if we did not release 1 more ppm of CO2 starting now, the lvls. of co2 will continue to rise for at least the next 50 yrs!
2007-04-20 11:43:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by bugs08 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
The inhabitants Bomb develop into written in 1968. The climate modeling technologies right now is carried out with modern-day supercomputers, sattelite records and different supplies. i think of your greater question is: Can unforseen advances and technologies help sidestep climate substitute? specific!!!! For starters, examine out how computing device technologies has helped in... say... climate modeling. there is likewise a push to advance new and inventive technologies, like gasoline-efficent vehicles, eco-friednly residences, potential savers, and so on., uncomplicated stuff, precise? it will help cut back our habit on foriegn oil, which won't be able to be all that undesirable, eh? in terms of moving far off from coal means, some have reported renewable potential (whether its uncertain how effective a windmil can particularly be) and nuclear potential (because of the fact it emmits no carbon). Scientists do not take this under consideration while the run thier computing device fashions because of the fact it is not a fact that we are going to enforce those technologies in time. it is already 2007 and we are nonetheless making use of a similar fuels guy used 200 years in the past (coal) and one hundred years in the past (gasoline). not the suited progression.
2016-11-26 01:09:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes It Will Get WORSE. I'm No Professional But The Coal Factory Things Pollute Too Much. So I Say Nuclear Power Is Cleaner But Its Also Very Dangerous Because There May Be A Meltdown.
2007-04-20 10:20:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by I is not my Name!!!! 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nothing we have done has made any difference. Nothing anyone is proposing will make any difference. The Kyoto protocol, if fully implemented, will make no important difference. Carpooling, recycling, planting trees, installing more windmills and solar panels, none of it will make even a dent in it.
2007-04-20 10:20:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It might get worse or it might get better, the point is that "worse" and "better" are subjective. Climatic changes have always taken place and will always take place, the question is which lifeforms will adapt to the new conditions and which ones will die out.
2007-04-20 12:02:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel 2
·
0⤊
2⤋